This assignment is designed for you to think, plan and act like an HR professional. HRM topics from this assignment will all come from Week 2 Chapter 2 material. Organizations must abide by the legal framework, within the jurisdiction that they operate within. Review the following case: Smith v. Network Technical Services Inc., from the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario. Please see the attached PDF Document. Please note: This case study was discussed during our live discussion on January 16, 2023. The company, Network Technical Services Inc., has hired you an HR Consultant to ensure the company's alignment with the Human Rights Code and create recommendations on what steps the organization can take to priortize diversity and inclusion into their business. Remember: HR professionals are required to consider various perspectives. When answer the case questions, be sure to consider multiple perspectives and make as many case connections as possible: Question \#1 - Briefly explain the facts of the case. Be sure to include information that addresses the who, what, where, when. ( 1 page 5 Marks) Question \#2 - Explain the difference between intentional and unintentional discrimination. Based on the details presented in the case, would this be considered intentional or unintentional discrimination? Explain your answer. ( 1 page - 10 Marks) Question \#3 - What is your opinion on the case study? ( 1 page 5 Marks) Question \#4 - Define the phrase Duty to Accommodate. Provide 2 recommendations on how the Network Technical Services Inc,, should have accommodated this employee. (1 page 10 Marks)