This is a classic tort case, decided when the tort law was evolving by one of the most admired jurists, Judge Cardozo. The case centers on "causation". Analyze this case in terms of causation. Do you agree with the outcome? Support your conclusion with legal analysis, i.e. apply the IRAC method of analysis. Make an original post of at least 100 words. Return before Thursday at noon and comment on the posts of at least two of your classmates with at least 45 words. You will need to post before you can see the replies of others