This is my paper please help me to make the below changes as needed.

CHAIN OF CUSTODY JOURNAL

In our recent readings, various forensic methodologies were explored, each with unique components critical to the integrity and efficacy of investigations. The most substantial elements observed across these methodologies include identification, preservation, collection, examination, analysis, and presentation of evidence. Each of these components plays a vital role in ensuring that forensic investigations are both thorough and reliable.

I need to make the following changes see below Ido not need to change the entire paper

To strengthen your argument, add more examples or evidence. Evidence provides concrete proof for your claims, moving beyond personal opinion to a supportable argument.

For example, in the second paragraph, consider elaborating on "automated logging systems". What kind of security measure does this provide? Also, add details to "regular training" What does training cover and what is the importance of it?

In the third paragraph, specify the tools and methods used in the forensic analysis. Mentioning specific forensic techniques would give your reader more depth of understanding. Expand on the chain of custody procedures. Add specific examples of how the chain of custody was maintained.

In the investigation of Drew Patrick's misuse of ACME Construction Company's intellectual property, the chain of custody played a critical role in validating the integrity of the evidence collected. Chain of custody refers to the process of documenting and maintaining control over evidence from the time it is seized until it is presented in court (Casey, 2011). In this case, the process began with the seizure of Drew's Western Digital hard drive, identified by its serial number NB497356F. Establishing and maintaining this documentation is essential because it ensures that the evidence remains admissible and credible in legal proceedings (Rogers, 2014). The forensic team carefully recorded each step of the investigation, which strengthened the findings that supported Drew's potential civil and criminal liability.

Drew's digital activity came under review after anomalies were detected in ACME's security systems, including unauthorized peer-to-peer (P2P) file transfers. The SOC flagged suspicious traffic from Drew's computer, which prompted a deeper investigation. Forensic tools such as FTK (Forensic Toolkit) were used to create a forensically sound copy of Drew's hard drive. Hash values were generated to confirm that the original and duplicate images were identical, preserving the integrity of the evidence (East, 2015). This process of duplicating and verifying data is a cornerstone of digital forensics because it prevents corruption or alteration of the original evidence (National Institute of Standards and Technology [NIST], 2014).

Another important aspect of chain of custody is its role in ensuring evidence can withstand legal challenges. Courts often scrutinize digital evidence, and any gaps in documentation can lead to questions about authenticity or tampering (Easttom, 2021). Industry standards such as ISO/IEC 27037 and NIST guidelines emphasize that proper identification, collection, and preservation of evidence are critical to maintaining credibility (NIST, 2014). In Drew's case, the forensic team's adherence to these standards not only protected the integrity of the evidence but also reinforced ACME's organizational policies. Looking forward, implementing automated logging systems and providing regular training for staff could further strengthen the company's ability to maintain a reliable chain of custody.

The forensic analysis uncovered multiple forms of incriminating evidence, including emails containing proprietary information sent to external accounts, encrypted SQL database files, and internet searches related to selling intellectual property on the dark web. These findings demonstrated Drew's intent to misuse company secrets for personal gain. Importantly, the forensic team adhered to strict legal and organizational protocols, ensuring that the chain of custody was preserved throughout the investigation. By following these procedures, the team not only highlighted Drew's misconduct but also provided the legal department with reliable documentation to support their case (Ashford et al., 2016). This reinforces the importance of a well-documented chain of custody in digital forensics, as it protects both the evidence and the integrity of the justice process.