This is the pdf for this homework need help to understanding the instructions?

Enhancing Student Retention and Success at Community College Logic Model for Change Initiative:

Inputs: Financial Resources: Funding allocated to support the change initiative. Human Resources: Trained faculty, advisors, and support staff. Curriculum and Program Development: New courses and support programs. Technological Infrastructure: Improved learning management systems and data analytics tools. Community Partnerships: Collaboration with local businesses and organizations.

Activities: Curriculum Enhancement: Develop and implement engaging, relevant course materials. Student Support Services: Offer academic advising, tutoring, and counseling. Technology Integration: Implement digital tools and resources for blended learning. Community Engagement: Establish internships, mentorship programs, and job placement services. Professional Development: Train faculty and staff on best practices.

Outputs: Updated Courses: Enhanced and relevant curricula in various fields. Increased Student Engagement: Greater student participation in extracurricular activities. Improved Advising Services: More students receiving academic guidance. Technology Integration: Access to online resources and tools. Community Partnerships: Collaboration with local businesses and organizations.

Short-Term Outcomes: Higher Retention Rates: Increased enrollment from semester to semester. Improved Course Performance: Better grades and academic progress. Student Satisfaction: Positive feedback from students regarding the changes. Increased Awareness: Improved student awareness of support services. Internship Opportunities: More students securing internships.

Intermediate Outcomes: Degree Completion: Increased number of students earning degrees or certificates. Job Placement: Higher percentage of graduates gaining employment. Community Recognition: Recognition and support from local businesses. Faculty Engagement: Greater faculty involvement in program improvement. Data-Driven Decision-Making: Using data to make informed decisions.

Long-Term Outcomes: High Graduation Rates: Consistent, high-level graduation rates. Strong Community Ties: Ongoing partnerships with local organizations. Enhanced Reputation: Becoming a model community college for success. Sustained Growth: Enrollment growth and financial stability. Student Empowerment: Graduates contributing to the community.

Data Collection for the Community College Change Initiative: Enhancing Student Retention and Success In the bustling corridors of Community College X, a team of dedicated researchers embarked on a mission to assess the impact of their change initiative aimed at enhancing student retention and success. The initiative had introduced numerous interventions and improvements, and the research team was determined to gather both quantitative and qualitative data to measure its effectiveness.

Participants: The participants in this data collection effort included students, faculty, advisors, and alumni of Community College X. Here's a portrayal of the total population and the sampling strategy employed to determine the participants for data collection:

Total Population: Community College X was home to a bustling community of 5,000 students, 150 faculty members, and an alumni network of 1,200 individuals. The total population, therefore, consisted of students, faculty, advisors, and alumni who had been part of the college during and after the implementation of the change initiative.

Sampling Strategy: To ensure a representative sample and make the best use of resources, the research team employed a mixed-methods sampling strategy that included both random and purposeful sampling methods.

Random Sampling for Surveys: Students: To gather quantitative data through surveys, the research team employed simple random sampling. They used a random number generator to select 500 students from the population of 5,000. This approach ensured that a diverse group of students was represented. Faculty and Advisors: A random sample of 50 faculty and advisors was selected from the total population of 150 to participate in the surveys.

Purposeful Sampling for Focus Groups: Students: To delve into the qualitative aspects of the initiative, the research team opted for purposeful sampling for the focus groups. Students were selected purposefully to ensure a variety of experiences and perspectives were represented. Participants included students from different programs, academic levels, and backgrounds. The goal was to capture a comprehensive view of the student body's experiences. Faculty Members: Faculty members who were actively involved in the curriculum enhancements were purposefully chosen to participate in the focus groups. This ensured that their insights were well-represented. Alumni: To gain insights into the long-term impact of the initiative, the research team selected alumni purposefully. They sought individuals who had graduated during or after the initiative's implementation and had since entered the workforce.

The combination of random and purposeful sampling allowed the research team to gather a diverse set of perspectives and experiences, ensuring that the data collected accurately reflected the broader population at Community College X. This approach enhanced the validity and reliability of the assessment and provided a well-rounded understanding of the change initiative's impact.

Data Collection Methods: The research team employed a combination of surveys, focus groups, and academic records analysis to comprehensively assess the outcomes and experiences of the change initiative.

Qualitative Data:

1. Surveys: Students, faculty, and alumni were invited to participate in surveys aimed at gathering quantitative data regarding their experiences with the change initiative. These surveys contained both closed-ended and Likert scale questions, allowing for easy quantitative analysis. The survey participants were selected randomly from the student body, and 500 individuals completed the survey.

2. Focus Groups: To delve deeper into the qualitative aspects of the initiative, the research team organized focus groups comprising students and faculty members. These sessions provided a platform for participants to share their insights, stories, and perspectives. Faculty members were selected based on their involvement in the curriculum enhancements, while student participants were chosen to represent a diverse range of experiences. A total of five focus groups were conducted.

Quantitative Data: Based on the survey responses, the research team collected quantitative data, such as retention rates and responses to Likert scale questions. Here's a snapshot of the data:

Retention Rate: Before the change initiative, the annual retention rate was 70%. After the initiative, the retention rate increased to 85%.

Student Satisfaction (Likert Scale): On a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied), the average student satisfaction rating post-initiative was 4.2.

Course Performance Improvement: Pre-initiative, 60% of students passed their courses. Post-initiative, the pass rate increased to 80%.

Fictional Qualitative Data: From the focus group sessions, the research team gathered rich qualitative data that provided a deeper understanding of the change initiative's impact. Here are some fictional quotes and insights:

Student A (focus group participant): "The academic advisors were more accessible after the changes. They really helped me plan my courses better, and that made a huge difference in my success."

Faculty B (focus group participant): "The updated curriculum made teaching so much more engaging. Students were more motivated, and I saw a noticeable improvement in their performance."

Alumnus C (focus group participant): "I can see the changes. More of my fellow alumni are getting great jobs, and that speaks volumes about the college's efforts." This combined quantitative and qualitative data helped the research team gain a comprehensive understanding of the change initiative's impact on student retention and success at Community College X. The data provided valuable insights into the effectiveness of the initiative and offered a foundation for making informed decisions about its future.

Instructions: Part 1: Data Analysis and Interpretation (30 points)

Utilize the fictional quantitative data provided from the Community College X change initiative:

• Provide a brief interpretation of each calculated result
• Explain what it signifies about the change initiative's impact on student retention and success.

Part 2: Communication of Findings (30 points)

Prepare a concise report (maximum 2 pages) that communicates the key findings of your data analysis. Include:

• A summary of the data analysis results.
• A description of how these results relate to the initiative's short-term outcomes from the logic model.
• An evaluation of the initiative's performance against its projected goals.

Part 3: Reflection (40 points)

Reflect on the effectiveness of the data collected in measuring the success of the change initiative. In your reflection, consider the following:

• Did the data align with the logic model's short-term outcomes?
• Did the data provide valuable insights into the initiative's impact?
• Were there any limitations in the data collection methods?
• How could the data be used to inform future decisions and improvements regarding the initiative?
• What other data would have strengthed the understanding of the impact of the initiative?