Question: This is try number 6 - its been wrong every single time ive asked - i will give a thumbs up when it is correct

This is try number 6 - its been wrong every single time ive asked - i will give a thumbs up when it is correct - please help and someone actually give me the correct answer

This is try number 6 - its been wrong every single time

Here is a screenshot of all the times someone has given me a wrong answer for the same question - please help and give me the correct responses, please

ive asked - i will give a thumbs up when it is

JL.81 As a result of many process improvements and IT implementations (like EDI), Big Box-Mart has been able to reduce its order costs from $37.20 to $7.81 when purchasing cases of paper towels from its main paper-products supplier. Annual demand is expected to be 243,000 cases and annual holding costs are $6.58 per case. Hint \#1: This is a purchasing order quantity problem (EOQ), not a production order quantity problem. For this question we are combining a JIT concept (lower ordering costs) with what you learned from a previous chapter (inventory management). If necessary, refer back to that chapter. Hint \#2: Remember to use cell references in all your formulas rather than using a rounded input value from a previous calculation. Based on this information, what will be the new optimal order quantity (using the reduced ordering cost)? (Display your answer to the nearest whole number.) When using the reduced ordering cost, as compared to the original ordering cost, by how many cases will the average inventory go down? (Display your answer to the nearest whole number.) What will be the annual total combined savings to ordering costs and holding costs when using the reduced order cost, as compared to the original ordering cost? (Display your answer to two decimal places.) posts an se se per esco Hin at: Tis is a puchasing oved quarety problem (EDC, not a production ordar quasty problem. For this quebsen we are conbining a at corergt fower ondering cossis) with whar you leamed from a previous chepter (imentory nensoenentif. If necessay, iefer back to thet chapter Based on this information, what wa be fie new cpinul onder quantly (ving the reduced ordeing cost)? (Display your answer to the nearest whole number) When wang fhe reduced ordering cost, as compered to the original erdeting oost, by how many cases will the average invertory po down? (Display your anewer to the neerast whole number coen? (Dasplay your areater to two decinal places ) Here is a screenshot of some of the other times ive asked the same question on here and gotten wildly different responses :? Attempt \#4 and im almost out of questions :' - PLEASE HELP - I will always thumbs up correct responses (everthing in red is wrong) ocsts ane 80 se per case Hint at: This is a purchasing onder euaniy problen (ECCl, not a production order quarely peobien. For this question we are oombining a st oonoect fower ardier no the nowess whole number) oear? (Diaplay your arteper to tap decimal placest) And for reference, here was the previous (incorrect) attempt of the same

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!