this is what a classmate wrote on my discussion post, respond to it

Good morning, Shatasha Your post provides a clear and well-organized distinction between social problems and research problems. You effectively emphasized the broader societal impact of social problems, describing them as complex and multifaceted issues requiring collective and systemic responses. I noticed how you linked social problems to their cultural, economic, and political roots, highlighting the need for historical and systemic analyses. This aligns well with Creswell and Creswell's (2017) assertion that social problems often emerge from deep-seated societal structures and thus require interdisciplinary solutions. Your explanation of research problems is equally thorough. You demonstrate a strong understanding of their academic purpose by focusing on how research problems are narrower and aimed at filling gaps in the literature or clarifying inconsistencies. Additionally, you correctly point out that while research problems often draw inspiration from social issues, they maintain a more focused and manageable scope suitable for empirical investigation. This distinction is crucial in academic research, as emphasized by Ravitch and Carl (2019), who note that a clearly defined research problem is foundational for the development of research questions and study design. One suggestion for enhancing your discussion is to further elaborate on how a well-formulated research problem can lead to actionable solutions for social problems. For instance, social problems like educational inequality can be broken down into specific research problems, such as the impact of teacher-student ratios on learning outcomes in underfunded schools. This level of specificity clarifies the research scope and enhances the practical relevance of the findings (Patton, 2014). As a further resource, I recommend reviewing Maxwell's (2013) Qualitative Research Design, which provides excellent strategies for linking research questions to real-world problems while maintaining rigorous academic standards. References Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications. https:/www.google.com/books/edition/Research Design/335ZDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq_Creswell,+J.+W.+%26+Creswell,+J.+D.+ (2018).+Research+design: +Qualitative. +quantitative, +and+mixed+methods+approaches&pg_PT16&printsec=frontcover Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach: An interactive approach. Sage.https://www.google.com/books/edition/Qualitative Research Design An Interacti/DFZc28cayiUC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq_Maxwell,+J.+.A.+ (2013).+Qualitative +research+design:+An +interactive+approach+(3rd+ed.).&pg_PR5&printsec=frontcover B Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications. Ravitch, S. M., & Carl, N. M. (2019). Qualitative research: Bridging the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological. Sage publications. https:/www.google.com/books/edition/Qualitative Research/2--9DwAAQBAJ?hl-en&gbpv=1&dq_Ravitch,+S.+M.,+%26+Carl,+N.+M.+ (2021).+Qualitative +research: +Bridging+the +conceptual,+theoretical, +and+methodological+(2nd +ed.)&pg PA1990&printsec=frontcover