Question: to identify academic dishonesty. test stat is compared. null hypo= student not cheating, and null hypo was rejected. second pass testing was conducted by humans.
to identify academic dishonesty. test stat is compared. null hypo= student not cheating, and null hypo was rejected. second pass testing was conducted by humans.
a. unusual behaviour added to cum test stat ( no strange=0, more strange= bigger number) would test involve one or two tailed hypo test
b. if we want to test potential cheaters , should we opt for higher or lower significance level
c. what would p-value of test represent
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
