To initiate the data collection process for constructing the regression model analyzing the relationship between ESG integration and financial performance, we have gathered data of NVIDIA Corporation. This comprehensive data set encompasses various aspects, including the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores, financial performance metrics, such as Return on assets, and relevant control variables such as company size (Total Assets). Through meticulous data collection and organization, we aim to uncover valuable insights into the impact of ESG factors on the financial performance of NVIDIA Corporation.

Here is the data of NVIDIA Corporation with its (Return on Assets as a dependent variable), (Environmental, Social, and Governance scores as an independent variable) and (Total Assets as a Control variable).

Data Analysis

We start by examining the dataset, which includes financial performance metrics and ESG scores for NVIDIA Corporation across multiple years. We look at basic statistics, ensuring the data is complete and free from outliers. Next, we explore how the variables relate to each other, particularly focusing on how ESG factors (independent variable) and Total Assets (control variable) might affect Return on assets (dependent variable). We'll check for any issues like multicollinearity, which could impact our analysis. Using regression analysis, we'll then investigate the specific influence of ESG factors and Total Assets on NVIDIA's Return on assets. We aim to understand how sustainable investing practices may impact financial performance, providing insights relevant to investors and stakeholders interested in ESG integration.

First, we will perform the regression analysis with dependent and independent variables. In this case, we will use multiple linear regression since we have multiple independent variables. We will use RStudio for the multiple linear regression.

Interpretation Of Results:

Hypothesis check with F Statistics and P-value:

H0 (Null Hypothesis): There is no significant relationship between the integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors in investment strategies and the financial performance of investments.

H1 (Alternative Hypothesis):The integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors in investment strategies is positively related to the financial performance of investments, with varying degrees of impact attributable to each ESG component.

The value of F statistics is 8.607 and the P-value is 0.0008163. My hypothesis is below.

With a p-value significantly lower than 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis (H0) that there is no significant relationship between the integration of ESG factors in investment strategies and financial performance. Instead, we accept the alternative hypothesis (H1) that there is a positive relationship between integrating ESG factors and financial performance.

This suggests that the inclusion of ESG factors in investment strategies has a statistically significant impact on financial performance, although the exact degree of impact attributable to each ESG component may vary.

In summary, based on the F-statistic and its associated p-value, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a statistically significant relationship between ESG integration in investment strategies and financial performance.

Interpretation of P-value for independent variables.

Environmental Risk Score:

The p-value associated with ES is 0.0216.

Since the p-value (0. 0216) is less than the significance level (0.05), we reject the null hypothesis for ES.

Therefore, evidence suggests that the Environmental Risk Score has a significant effect on financial performance, supporting the alternative hypothesis (H1) that there is a significant relationship between ESG integration and financial performance.

Social Risk Score:

The p-value associated with SS is 0.4954.

Since the p-value (0. 4954) is greater than the significance level (0.05), we fail to reject the null hypothesis for SS and conclude that there is no relationship betweenthe integration of social factors in investment strategies and the financial performance of investments.

Governance Risk Score:

The p-value associated with GS is 0.4218.

Since the p-value (0.4218) is greater than the significance level (0.05), we fail to reject the null hypothesis for GS and conclude that there is no relationship betweenthe integration of social factors in investment strategies and the financial performance of investments.

T-statistics:

T-statistics
Environmental Score	2.503
Social Score	0.695
Governance Score	-0.821

Our T-statistics for the ES, SS, and GS are 2.503, 0.695 and -0.821 respectively. We can calculate this by dividing Coefficients by Standard Error.

Degrees of Freedom:

Our degree of freedom for regression is 3 (k-1, 4-1), as we have a total of 4 parameters (one dependent variable, and 3 independent variables).

The degree of freedom for residual is 19 (n-k, 23-4). And the total is 22 (n-1, 23-1), and our total observations are 23 so n = 23.

Model Description:

Financial Performance = 0 + 1 (ES) + 2(SS) + 3(GS) + 4(Control_Variables) +

0	2.8132
1	1.8535
2	1.5217
3	-2.1644

Financial Performance =2.8132 +1.8535(ES) +1.5217(SS) +-2.1644 (GS) + 4(Control_Variables) +

95% Confidence interval:

95% Confidence interval
	Lower Bound	Upper Bound
Intercept	-0.1452100	5.771693
ES	0.3034212	3.403568
SS	-3.0602387	6.103587
GS	-7.6816148	3.352741

The CI for the intercept is -0.1452100 to 5.771693.

The CI for the 1 is 0.3034212 to 3.403568.

The CI for the 2 is -3.0602387 to 6.103587.

The CI for the 3 is -7.6816148 to 3.352741.

Descriptive statistics from the regression output:

R Square (Coefficient of Determination):R squared represents the proportion of the variance in the dependent variable that is explained by the independent variables in the model. In this case, the R squared value of 0.5761 indicates that approximately 57.61% of the variance in the dependent variable is explained by the independent variables in the model. This suggests that the model provides a moderately good fit to the data. We can calculate this by dividing the sum of square regression by the sum of square total.

R Square:Adjusted R square is very helpful when we have more than one independent variable. This is the proportion of explained variation. In this case, the adjusted R squared value of 0.5091 is slightly lower than the R squared value, indicating that the model's fit is moderately good even after considering the number of predictors.

Standard Error Estimate:This represents the average deviation of the observed values from the predicted values in the regression model. A lower standard error indicates that the model has a better fit to the data. In this case, a residual standard error of 0.6574 suggests that the model has a relatively good fit to the data, with the observed values generally close to the values predicted by the regression equation. We can calculate the Standard of Error as Std. of Error = SQRT(MSE). Here MSE is the mean square error.

Interpretation of Residual Plots and Histogram:

Residual plots are used to assess the goodness of fit of a regression model. They plot the residuals, which are the differences between the observed values of the dependent variable and the corresponding predicted values of the independent variable from the regression model.

Here based on the histogram, we can say that our histogram of residuals appears symmetric and bell-shaped, with no evidence of skewness, which indicates that the residuals are normally distributed. This is a positive sign because linear regression assumes that the residuals follow a normal distribution.

From the residual plots, we can say that residual plots are scattered randomly around the horizontal line (straight red line). There are no clear outliers or clusters of points that deviate significantly from the general pattern. Outliers or clusters of points could indicate violations of the assumptions of linear regression, but in this plot, the points are evenly distributed.

Now we will perform the regression analysis with the help of dependent, independent, and control variables. We will use multiple linear regression since we have multiple independent variables. I am going to perform this regression analysis based on the results of RStudio. Here is a picture of the result.

The value of F statistics is 11.54 and the P-value is 8.068e-05. My hypothesis is below.

The extremely small p-value (p < 0.05) suggests that there is compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis (H0) and accept the alternative hypothesis (H1). Thus, the statistical study indicates that there is a statistically significant relationship between the financial performance of investments and the incorporation of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) concerns with control variable in investment strategies.

Interpretation of P-value for independent variables.

Environmental Risk Score:

The p-value associated with ES is 0.62426.

Since the p-value (0.62426) is greater than the significance level (0.05), we fail to reject the null hypothesis for ES and conclude that there is no relationship betweenthe integration of social factors in investment strategies and the financial performance of investments.

Social Risk Score:

The p-value associated with SS is 0.55634.

Since the p-value (0.55634) is greater than the significance level (0.05), we fail to reject the null hypothesis for SS and conclude that there is no relationship betweenthe integration of social factors in investment strategies and the financial performance of investments.

Governance Risk Score:

The p-value associated with GS is 0.56308.

Since the p-value (0.56308) is greater than the significance level (0.05), we fail to reject the null hypothesis for GS and conclude that there is no relationship betweenthe integration of social factors in investment strategies and the financial performance of investments.

Control variable: (Total Assets)

The p-value associated with Total Assets is 0. 00717.Since the p-value (0.00717) is less than the significance level (0.05), we reject the null hypothesis for total assets.

Therefore, evidence suggests that the total assets have a significant effect on financial performance, supporting the alternative hypothesis (H1) that there is a significant relationship between ESG integration with the control variable and financial performance.

T-statistics:

T-statistics
Environmental Score	0.498
Social Score	0.599
Governance Score	0.589
Total Asset	-3.032

T-statistics for the independent variables ES, SS, and GS are 0.498, 0.599 and 0.589 respectively. This we can calculate by dividing Coefficients with Standard Error.

T-statistics for the control variable is -3.032.

T-statistics for the intercept is -0.063.

Degrees of Freedom:

Our degree of freedom for regression is 4 (k-1, 5-1), as we have a total of 5 parameters (one dependent variable, 3 independent variables and one control variable).

The degree of freedom for residual is 18 (n-k, 23-5).

Model Description:

Financial Performance = 0 + 1(ES) + 2(SS) + 3(GS) + 4(Control_Variables) +

0	-9.575e-02
1	3.911e-01
2	1.100e+00
3	1.479e+00
4	-6.842e-11

Financial Performance =-9.575e-02 +3.911e-01(ES) +1.100e+00(SS) +1.479e+00(GS) +-6.842e-11(Control_Variables) +

95% Confidence interval:

95% Confidence interval
	Lower Bound	Upper Bound
Intercept	-3.293593e+00	3.102083e+00
ES	-1.257699e+00	2.039955e+00
SS	-2.755536e+00	4.955787e+00
GS	-3.794339e+00	6.751721e+00
Total Assets	-1.158392e-10	-2.100554e-11

The CI for the dependent variable is -3.293593e+00 to 3.102083e+00.

The CI for the 1 is -1.257699e+00 to 2.039955e+00.

The CI for the 2 is -2.755536e+00 to 4.955787e+00.

The CI for the 3 is -3.794339e+00 to 6.751721e+00.

The CI for the control variable 4 is -1.158392e-10 to -2.100554e-11.

Descriptive statistics from the regression output:

R Square (Coefficient of Determination):R squared represents the proportion of the dependent variable's variation that can be explained by the model's independent variables and control variable. In this situation, an R-squared value of 0.7194 shows that the model's independent variables and control variables account for approximately 71.94% of the variance in the dependent variable. This shows that the model is an excellent fit for the data.

Adjusted R Square:When there are multiple independent variables, the adjusted R square can be extremely useful. This represents the proportion of explained variation. In this situation, the adjusted R squared value of 0.657 is a little lower than the R squared value, suggesting that the model's fit remains strong despite the number of predictors.

Standard Error of Estimate:This is the average deviation of observed values from predicted values in the regression model. A reduced standard error suggests that the model is more suited to the dataset. In this situation, the standard error of 0.5495 indicates that the model's predicted values are, on average, within 0.5495.

Interpretation of Residual Plots and Histogram:

Residual plots are used to assess the goodness of fit of a regression model. They plot the residuals, which are the differences between the observed values of the dependent variable and the corresponding predicted values of the independent variable and control variable from the regression model.

Here based on the histogram, we can say that our histogram of residuals appears is bell-shaped, with no evidence of skewness, which indicates that the histogram is normally distributed. This is a positive sign because linear regression assumes that the residuals follow a normal distribution.

From the residual plots, we can say that residual plots are scattered randomly around the horizontal line (straight red line). There are no outliers or clusters of points that deviate significantly from the general pattern. Outliers or clusters of points could indicate violations of the assumptions of linear regression, but in this plot, the points are evenly distributed.

Summary:

The study aimed to investigate the relationship between the integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors in investment strategies and the financial performance of NVIDIA Corporation. Data were collected on ESG scores, financial performance metrics (Return on Assets), and control variables (Total Assets) for the years 2001 to 2023.

Regression analysis was conducted using a multiple linear regression model, with Return on Assets as the dependent variable and ESG scores (ES, SS, GS) and Total Assets as independent and control variables, respectively. The model aimed to assess the impact of ESG integration on financial performance while controlling for other factors.

Hypothesis testing:

H0: There is no relationship between ESG scores and financial performance.

H1: ESG scores have a positive relationship with financial performance.

Firstly, with the result of the dependent and independent variables, we reject the null hypothesis as the P-value (0.0008163) associated with F-statistics is very smaller than the significance level 0.05, which concludes that there is evidence to support the alternative hypothesis.

Secondly, based on the result of dependent, independent, and control variables, we reject the null hypothesis as the P-value (8.068e-05) associated with F-statistics is very smaller than the significance level of 0.05, which concludes that there is evidence to support the alternative hypothesis.

In conclusion, the study found a statistically significant relationship between the integration of ESG factors in investment strategies and the financial performance of NVIDIA Corporation. Overall, the financial performance, ESG scores, and control variables are positively correlated.

Limitations of the study:

Information Access and Quality:The access and quality of ESG data might vary by company and area. Limited data availability or inconsistencies in the method of reporting may have an effect on the accuracy and reliability of the study, perhaps leading to bias or limitations in the findings.

Industry and Sector Variability: The impact of ESG issues on financial performance might differ between industries and sectors. Certain industries may confront environmental or social issues that affect the correlation between ESG integration and financial success. Failure to account for industry-specific dynamics may result in oversimplified results or restricted generalizability.

External Factors and Market Conditions: Changes in regulations, macroeconomic circumstances, and market trends can all have an impact on ESG practices and financial performance. Failure to effectively account for these external factors may conceal the underlying relationship between ESG integration and financial results.

Lack of consistency: There is a lack of consistency in how ESG elements are defined and quantified, which can lead to variations in the assessment of ESG criteria in investment plans.

Regional and Cultural Differences: The relationship between ESG integration and financial performance may be influenced by regional variances in culture, regulation, and institutions. Findings from research undertaken in certain countries or cultural contexts may not be readily transferable to other regions, demanding caution when interpreting the results internationally.

This is my research paper and I want the power presentation slides for this paper. the things you need to do is

Each group will be given 15-20 minutes to present the paper. Ensure that your presentation is dynamic, and contains bullet points only, i.e. avoid using long sentences.

6) Methodology and the econometric model employed

7) Data Analysis

8) Conclusion, implication and policy recommendation, and study limitations.

please make the powerpoint slides based on the research paper with the guidence.