Touchstone 2.1: Evaluate a SourceASSIGNMENT: You will select one of the sources that you intend to support your argument. Which source you choose is up to you; however, it should be substantial enough that you will be able to talk about it at length, and intricate enough that it will keep you (and your reader) interested. The introduction of this paper will involve introducing the source: After you recap your research paper's central argument argument, provide the author, the title, and the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.) You will then go on to evaluate the source on two levels:

1. Credibility (at least one full para): Using the information in this unit as a guide, evaluate the source's authenticity and reliability. Look at all the information that you can find about the source to establish the author's (or sponsor's) trustworthiness.
2. Usefulness (at least one full para): Using a combination of summary and analysis, examine the source on a critical level. Determine what the source's purpose (thesis) is, and how it arrives at that goal. Examine its value to you and the project you are working on. How will it help you prove your own points? How might it come in handy to back up a claim (or address a counter-claim)?

Finally, you will include a conclusion which shows your final assessments on both counts. Sample Touchstone

A. Assignment Guidelines

DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines. Refer to the Sample Touchstone for additional guidance on structure, formatting, and citation.

1. Source Identification

The introduction of this paper will be introducing the source:

Have you recapped your research paper's central argument? Have you provided the author's name? Have you provided the source title? Have you provided the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)? Have you ended the introduction with a thesis statement that sums up your evaluation of the source's credibility and usefulness?

2. Source Evaluation

Have you provided an evaluation on the source's credibility in at least one full paragraph? Have you used specific, accurate page/paragraph-numbered examples from the source to illustrate your evaluation on credibility? Have you provided a judgment on the source's usefulness in at least one full paragraph? Have you used at least two specific quotations (cited with accurate page/paragraph-numbers) from the source to illustrate your evaluation of its usefulness? Did you include a reference list with complete source data such as author(s)' name(s), date of publication, title, publication outlet or journal, an URL address (if available)?

3. Reflection Have you answered all reflection questions including specific and concrete examples that provide thoughtful insight in all responses? Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?

B. Reflection Questions

DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.

1. What types of questions did you ask yourself when evaluating the credibility and usefulness of your source? (2-3 sent)
2. How do you feel this evaluation practice will help you as you continue to move through the research process? (2-3 sent)

HERE MY OUTLINE

Research Question and Working Thesis:

Research Question:Should using genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture be more strictly regulated to address environmental concerns, potential health risks, and ethical considerations?

Working Thesis: The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture should be subjected to stricter regulations due to the environmental Impact on biodiversity, potential health risks associated with consumption, and ethical concerns surrounding corporate control over seed patents.

Detailed Outline:

1. Introduction

A. Brief overview of the widespread use of GMOs in agriculture

B. Working thesis statement

II. Environmental Concerns

A. Impact on biodiversity

1. Disruption of ecosystems

2. Cross-contamination with non-GMO crops

B. Overreliance on monoculture

1. Increased vulnerability to pests and diseases

2. Soil degradation

III. Health Risks

A. Potential allergenic effects

1. Lack of long-term studies on human health

2. Unknown consequences of genetic modifications on allergenicity

B. Antibiotic resistance

1. Use of antibiotic resistance genes in GMOs

2. Concerns about the transfer of resistance to human pathogens

IV. Ethical Considerations

A. Corporate control over seed patents

1. Farmer dependence on seed purchases

2. Monopolistic practices of biotechnology companies

B. Lack of transparency in labeling

1. Consumer right to know about GMO content

2. Potential long-term consequences on human health

V. Addressing Counterarguments

A. Acknowledgment of increased crop yields with GMOs

1. Balancing benefits and risks

2. Alternative methods for improving agricultural productivity

VI. Conclusion

A. Recap of critical points

B. Emphasis on the need for stricter regulations on GMOs