True or false

$1.$ Exemption F is ambiguous, and that statutory ambiguity must be resolved by

examining the regulations issued under Maine wage and hour law.

$2.$ The U$.$S$.$ District Court for the District of Maine is a court of unlimited

jurisdiction, which is unrestricted with respect to the type of case it can hear and

resolve.

$3.$ If Exemption F is ambiguous, the First Circuit must construe the statute in favor

of Oakhurst, because their interpretation of Exemption F furthers the overtime

law$$s essential and remedial purposes.

$4.$ The U$.$S$.$ District Court for the District of Maine has subject matter jurisdiction

$($overtime wages under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act$)$ and personal

jurisdiction over the delivery drivers $($they pursued their claim in federal district

court$)$ and Oakhurst $($who did not object to the court$$s jurisdiction$).$

$5.$ The U$.$S$.$ District Court for the District of Maine and the Maine Superior Court

$($Maine$$s general jurisdiction court$)$ have concurrent jurisdiction over the delivery

drivers$$ claim.