True or false $1.$ The Judicial Code$$s restrictions on judicial candidates soliciting campaign

contributions does not violate the First Amendment, because it permits campaign

committees to raise money for election campaigns and permits judicial candidates

to write notes to contributors thanking them for their contributions.

$2.$ Canon $7$C$(1)$ is unconstitutional under the First Amendment, because it prohibits

all solicitations by judicial candidates for campaign contributions, rather than

narrowly tailoring that restrictions to lawyers or litigants who might appear

before the judicial candidate after they are elected to office.

$3.$ Because Canon $7$C$(1)$ restricts fully protected speech on the basis of content, it

presumptively violates the First Amendment and may be uphold only if Florida

meets its burden of showing that the Canon survives intermediate scrutiny.

$4.$ Florida lacks a compelling interest in preserving public confidence in the

independence of its judiciary.

$5.$ Breyer, Sotomayor and Kagan concurred in the opinion written by Roberts;

Ginsburg concurred with the opinion written by Roberts except for Part II; hence

Roberts$$ decision is a majority decision.