unauthorized access.$$While there are no known attacks using the$$Meltdown vulnerability, the patch will decrease$$performance on Intel chips from $5\%-30\%.$ Chips by$$other companies such as AMD and ARM will not$$have their performance adversely affected because$$they do not contain the design flaw that allows the$$Meltdown bug and do not need the patch. Software$$developers do not have a fix for the Spectre bug yet$$and do not know what impact it would have. Based$$on what you learned about product liability, do you$$think end users have a case to make against Intel for$$the Meltdown exploit? What theory of product liability$$do you think would make the best case against$$Intel$?$ What defense could Intel mount?