Question: undefined AutoSave OFF Document1 Home Insert Draw Design Layout References Mailings Review View Tell me Share Comments to V V SmartArt h Chart Screenshot A

undefined AutoSave OFF Document1 Home Insert Drawundefined

AutoSave OFF Document1 Home Insert Draw Design Layout References Mailings Review View Tell me Share Comments to V V SmartArt h Chart Screenshot A T22 Pages Table Pictures Shapes Icons Add-ins Media Links 3D Models Comment Header Footer Text Page Number Equation Advanced Symbol CHAPTER 4 - TECHNICAL CASE A major Polytechnical University collected data on yearly freshman applications (students who apply but might not be accepted or enroll). These are shown in the following table: YEAR 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 ACTUAL 400 600 400 500 1000 800 700 900 1200 1400 1500 REGISTRATIONS Use the above to answer these questions: 1. Develop a 3-year MOVING AVERAGE to FORECAST applications from YEAR 2013 through YEAR 2022 (round UP - no partial students please!) 2. ESTIMATE the applications again for years 2013 through 2022 with a 3- year WEIGHTED MOVING AVERAGE in which registrations in the most recent year are given a weight of 2 and registrations in the others 2 years are each given a weight of 1. 3. Graph the ACTUAL REGISTRATIONS from the chart above against both the MOVING AVERAGE and the WEIGHTED MOVING AVERAGE. Which of the two methods comes closest to the actual and which seems better? Why? Page 1 of 1 162 words English (United States) Focus 110%

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!