Under Article 201 of the Revised Penal Code, there are prohibitions against immoral doctrines, obscene publications, and indecent shows, which could encompass the type of pictorial described if deemed offensive or inappropriate for the location. the councilor's intervention was legally sound. Manila's ordinance against lewd acts, upheld by the Supreme Court, falls under the government's authority to protect public morals and welfare. The photoshoot's potentially indecent actions, including the director's instructions, strongly suggest a violation. While a precise legal determination needs specific details, the councilor's actions were justified in upholding community standards.Given these considerations, the Manila councilor likely had the right to intervene based on local ordinances concerning public decency. The organizers and participants of the pictorial may have violated these laws if their actions were deemed to contravene the standards of decency expected in public spaces, especially in a historic site like Fort Santiago. If the councilor acted based on a legitimate concern regarding the violation of public decency laws, then their intervention was justified. The specific articles or ordinances violated would depend on the local regulations in effect at the time and location of the event. Give more impactful