Under the minimum rationality approach, a law creating different classifications will

survive an equal protection challenge if it has a

justified interest in a goal that is prohibited by another provision of the

Constitution

legitimate goal that is unrelated to the government

wholly arbitrary basis that protects state interest$*$

rational connection to a permissible state end

Which test or approach under the equal protection clause of the U$.$S$.$ Constitution is

used if a classification involves either a fundamental constitutional right or a suspect

class?

The minimum rationality approach

The traditional approach

The strict scrutiny test

The quasi$-$strict scrutiny test