Unimin Canada Ltd v United Steelworkers, Local 5383. 2017 CanLII 31794 (Ont LA). USWA Local 862...
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
Transcribed Image Text:
Unimin Canada Ltd v United Steelworkers, Local 5383. 2017 CanLII 31794 (Ont LA). USWA Local 862 v Canadian General Tower Ltd. [2003] OLAA no 801. Vu, Uyen. Ottawa Proposes Corporate Killing Law. Canadian HR Reporter. July 14, 2003, p. 1. Workers Health & Safety Centre. Resources. Accessed February 2018. https://www.whsc.on.ca/Resources/ Publications/WHMIS-Resources. Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997. SO 1997, c 16, Schedule A. York Condominium Corp No 163 v Robinson, 2017 ONSC 2419. RELATED WEBSITES • http://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/psychosocial/violence. html The Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS) website contains an extensive list of questions and answers on workplace violence issues. • https://www.labour.gov.on.ca/english/hs/topics/ workplaceviolence.php The Ontario Ministry of Labour website contains resources to help employers develop policies and programs to prevent and address workplace violence and harassment. REVIEW AND DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 1. Ontario's health and safety legislation is based on an internal responsibility system. Explain this term. In your opinion, is it an effective approach to ensuring safety in the workplace? Give reasons for your answer. 2. Name and explain the three core worker rights under Ontario's OHSA. 3. What are the responsibilities of certified members of a JHSC? 4. Explain the due diligence defence. What steps can employers take to establish this defence? 5. You are the human resources manager in a small manufacturing firm. An operations supervisor, Habrim, comes to you with a problem. The plant has just started working on a rush order from a major customer and now one of his production workers (Bruce) has refused to work because he says that his machinery is unsafe. Habrim checked the machine and it looked safe to him. He then contacted the Ministry of Labour to further investigate the refusal but he is wondering whether, in the meantime, he can get another employee to work on the machine that Bruce says is unsafe. Advise Habrim by explaining to him what the law requires in these circumstances. 6. Thompson, an experienced operator of the bar bundler packager at ABC Steel Co., noticed that bars had fallen into the basement of the packager. Contrary to his training and the employer's safety protocol, Thompson did not lock out the machine. Instead, he placed the machine on automatic and entered the basement area. To get there, he had to push open a self-closing swing gate which displayed a sign warning that the packager had to be "locked out" before entry. Similar signage was on the guard rail fence. Nonetheless, Thompson continued into the basement area; within moments, he was crushed to death by a movable portion of the bundler. The employer was charged with breaching section 25 of the Industrial Establishments regulation under the OHSA, which requires machines with hazards to have a guard to prevent access to the pinch point-the point where moving machinery parts are strong enough to pull someone in and injure them. The employer argued that it had done everything reasonable in the circumstances-employee training, a gate that closed automatically, and ample signage. It claimed that it is impossible to foresee and therefore guard against "reckless" employees who do the totally unexpected-even a locked gate would not have deterred a "determined and intentioned" employee like Thompson. On the basis of these facts, answer the following questions: a. Is this a strict liability offence? If so, does the Ministry of Labour have to prove anything or does the entire burden of proof lie with the employer? b. The employer may avoid liability if it shows that it exercised due diligence in attempting to carry out its duties. What is the standard of proof in making out a due diligence defence: "beyo d a reasonable doubt" or "on a balance of probabilities"? Research what these two different standards of proof mean. c. In light of all the circumstances, in your view did the employer exercise due diligence in the steps it took to protect employees from this hazard? If not, what additional steps should it have taken? Unimin Canada Ltd v United Steelworkers, Local 5383. 2017 CanLII 31794 (Ont LA). USWA Local 862 v Canadian General Tower Ltd. [2003] OLAA no 801. Vu, Uyen. Ottawa Proposes Corporate Killing Law. Canadian HR Reporter. July 14, 2003, p. 1. Workers Health & Safety Centre. Resources. Accessed February 2018. https://www.whsc.on.ca/Resources/ Publications/WHMIS-Resources. Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997. SO 1997, c 16, Schedule A. York Condominium Corp No 163 v Robinson, 2017 ONSC 2419. RELATED WEBSITES • http://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/psychosocial/violence. html The Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS) website contains an extensive list of questions and answers on workplace violence issues. • https://www.labour.gov.on.ca/english/hs/topics/ workplaceviolence.php The Ontario Ministry of Labour website contains resources to help employers develop policies and programs to prevent and address workplace violence and harassment. REVIEW AND DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 1. Ontario's health and safety legislation is based on an internal responsibility system. Explain this term. In your opinion, is it an effective approach to ensuring safety in the workplace? Give reasons for your answer. 2. Name and explain the three core worker rights under Ontario's OHSA. 3. What are the responsibilities of certified members of a JHSC? 4. Explain the due diligence defence. What steps can employers take to establish this defence? 5. You are the human resources manager in a small manufacturing firm. An operations supervisor, Habrim, comes to you with a problem. The plant has just started working on a rush order from a major customer and now one of his production workers (Bruce) has refused to work because he says that his machinery is unsafe. Habrim checked the machine and it looked safe to him. He then contacted the Ministry of Labour to further investigate the refusal but he is wondering whether, in the meantime, he can get another employee to work on the machine that Bruce says is unsafe. Advise Habrim by explaining to him what the law requires in these circumstances. 6. Thompson, an experienced operator of the bar bundler packager at ABC Steel Co., noticed that bars had fallen into the basement of the packager. Contrary to his training and the employer's safety protocol, Thompson did not lock out the machine. Instead, he placed the machine on automatic and entered the basement area. To get there, he had to push open a self-closing swing gate which displayed a sign warning that the packager had to be "locked out" before entry. Similar signage was on the guard rail fence. Nonetheless, Thompson continued into the basement area; within moments, he was crushed to death by a movable portion of the bundler. The employer was charged with breaching section 25 of the Industrial Establishments regulation under the OHSA, which requires machines with hazards to have a guard to prevent access to the pinch point-the point where moving machinery parts are strong enough to pull someone in and injure them. The employer argued that it had done everything reasonable in the circumstances-employee training, a gate that closed automatically, and ample signage. It claimed that it is impossible to foresee and therefore guard against "reckless" employees who do the totally unexpected-even a locked gate would not have deterred a "determined and intentioned" employee like Thompson. On the basis of these facts, answer the following questions: a. Is this a strict liability offence? If so, does the Ministry of Labour have to prove anything or does the entire burden of proof lie with the employer? b. The employer may avoid liability if it shows that it exercised due diligence in attempting to carry out its duties. What is the standard of proof in making out a due diligence defence: "beyo d a reasonable doubt" or "on a balance of probabilities"? Research what these two different standards of proof mean. c. In light of all the circumstances, in your view did the employer exercise due diligence in the steps it took to protect employees from this hazard? If not, what additional steps should it have taken? Unimin Canada Ltd v United Steelworkers, Local 5383. 2017 CanLII 31794 (Ont LA). USWA Local 862 v Canadian General Tower Ltd. [2003] OLAA no 801. Vu, Uyen. Ottawa Proposes Corporate Killing Law. Canadian HR Reporter. July 14, 2003, p. 1. Workers Health & Safety Centre. Resources. Accessed February 2018. https://www.whsc.on.ca/Resources/ Publications/WHMIS-Resources. Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997. SO 1997, c 16, Schedule A. York Condominium Corp No 163 v Robinson, 2017 ONSC 2419. RELATED WEBSITES • http://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/psychosocial/violence. html The Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS) website contains an extensive list of questions and answers on workplace violence issues. • https://www.labour.gov.on.ca/english/hs/topics/ workplaceviolence.php The Ontario Ministry of Labour website contains resources to help employers develop policies and programs to prevent and address workplace violence and harassment. REVIEW AND DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 1. Ontario's health and safety legislation is based on an internal responsibility system. Explain this term. In your opinion, is it an effective approach to ensuring safety in the workplace? Give reasons for your answer. 2. Name and explain the three core worker rights under Ontario's OHSA. 3. What are the responsibilities of certified members of a JHSC? 4. Explain the due diligence defence. What steps can employers take to establish this defence? 5. You are the human resources manager in a small manufacturing firm. An operations supervisor, Habrim, comes to you with a problem. The plant has just started working on a rush order from a major customer and now one of his production workers (Bruce) has refused to work because he says that his machinery is unsafe. Habrim checked the machine and it looked safe to him. He then contacted the Ministry of Labour to further investigate the refusal but he is wondering whether, in the meantime, he can get another employee to work on the machine that Bruce says is unsafe. Advise Habrim by explaining to him what the law requires in these circumstances. 6. Thompson, an experienced operator of the bar bundler packager at ABC Steel Co., noticed that bars had fallen into the basement of the packager. Contrary to his training and the employer's safety protocol, Thompson did not lock out the machine. Instead, he placed the machine on automatic and entered the basement area. To get there, he had to push open a self-closing swing gate which displayed a sign warning that the packager had to be "locked out" before entry. Similar signage was on the guard rail fence. Nonetheless, Thompson continued into the basement area; within moments, he was crushed to death by a movable portion of the bundler. The employer was charged with breaching section 25 of the Industrial Establishments regulation under the OHSA, which requires machines with hazards to have a guard to prevent access to the pinch point-the point where moving machinery parts are strong enough to pull someone in and injure them. The employer argued that it had done everything reasonable in the circumstances-employee training, a gate that closed automatically, and ample signage. It claimed that it is impossible to foresee and therefore guard against "reckless" employees who do the totally unexpected-even a locked gate would not have deterred a "determined and intentioned" employee like Thompson. On the basis of these facts, answer the following questions: a. Is this a strict liability offence? If so, does the Ministry of Labour have to prove anything or does the entire burden of proof lie with the employer? b. The employer may avoid liability if it shows that it exercised due diligence in attempting to carry out its duties. What is the standard of proof in making out a due diligence defence: "beyo d a reasonable doubt" or "on a balance of probabilities"? Research what these two different standards of proof mean. c. In light of all the circumstances, in your view did the employer exercise due diligence in the steps it took to protect employees from this hazard? If not, what additional steps should it have taken? Unimin Canada Ltd v United Steelworkers, Local 5383. 2017 CanLII 31794 (Ont LA). USWA Local 862 v Canadian General Tower Ltd. [2003] OLAA no 801. Vu, Uyen. Ottawa Proposes Corporate Killing Law. Canadian HR Reporter. July 14, 2003, p. 1. Workers Health & Safety Centre. Resources. Accessed February 2018. https://www.whsc.on.ca/Resources/ Publications/WHMIS-Resources. Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997. SO 1997, c 16, Schedule A. York Condominium Corp No 163 v Robinson, 2017 ONSC 2419. RELATED WEBSITES • http://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/psychosocial/violence. html The Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS) website contains an extensive list of questions and answers on workplace violence issues. • https://www.labour.gov.on.ca/english/hs/topics/ workplaceviolence.php The Ontario Ministry of Labour website contains resources to help employers develop policies and programs to prevent and address workplace violence and harassment. REVIEW AND DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 1. Ontario's health and safety legislation is based on an internal responsibility system. Explain this term. In your opinion, is it an effective approach to ensuring safety in the workplace? Give reasons for your answer. 2. Name and explain the three core worker rights under Ontario's OHSA. 3. What are the responsibilities of certified members of a JHSC? 4. Explain the due diligence defence. What steps can employers take to establish this defence? 5. You are the human resources manager in a small manufacturing firm. An operations supervisor, Habrim, comes to you with a problem. The plant has just started working on a rush order from a major customer and now one of his production workers (Bruce) has refused to work because he says that his machinery is unsafe. Habrim checked the machine and it looked safe to him. He then contacted the Ministry of Labour to further investigate the refusal but he is wondering whether, in the meantime, he can get another employee to work on the machine that Bruce says is unsafe. Advise Habrim by explaining to him what the law requires in these circumstances. 6. Thompson, an experienced operator of the bar bundler packager at ABC Steel Co., noticed that bars had fallen into the basement of the packager. Contrary to his training and the employer's safety protocol, Thompson did not lock out the machine. Instead, he placed the machine on automatic and entered the basement area. To get there, he had to push open a self-closing swing gate which displayed a sign warning that the packager had to be "locked out" before entry. Similar signage was on the guard rail fence. Nonetheless, Thompson continued into the basement area; within moments, he was crushed to death by a movable portion of the bundler. The employer was charged with breaching section 25 of the Industrial Establishments regulation under the OHSA, which requires machines with hazards to have a guard to prevent access to the pinch point-the point where moving machinery parts are strong enough to pull someone in and injure them. The employer argued that it had done everything reasonable in the circumstances-employee training, a gate that closed automatically, and ample signage. It claimed that it is impossible to foresee and therefore guard against "reckless" employees who do the totally unexpected-even a locked gate would not have deterred a "determined and intentioned" employee like Thompson. On the basis of these facts, answer the following questions: a. Is this a strict liability offence? If so, does the Ministry of Labour have to prove anything or does the entire burden of proof lie with the employer? b. The employer may avoid liability if it shows that it exercised due diligence in attempting to carry out its duties. What is the standard of proof in making out a due diligence defence: "beyo d a reasonable doubt" or "on a balance of probabilities"? Research what these two different standards of proof mean. c. In light of all the circumstances, in your view did the employer exercise due diligence in the steps it took to protect employees from this hazard? If not, what additional steps should it have taken?
Expert Answer:
Answer rating: 100% (QA)
I can provide a general overview and insights into the questions youve posted but keep in mind that I cannot access specific legal cases or websites H... View the full answer
Related Book For
Advanced Financial Accounting
ISBN: 978-0137030385
6th edition
Authors: Thomas Beechy, Umashanker Trivedi, Kenneth MacAulay
Posted Date:
Students also viewed these human resource management questions
-
Managing Scope Changes Case Study Scope changes on a project can occur regardless of how well the project is planned or executed. Scope changes can be the result of something that was omitted during...
-
Multiple Choice Questions 1. If a company has a $25,000 reduction in sales and an increase of $7,000 in fixed costs with a contribution margin ratio of 34 percent, by how much will net income change?...
-
The following financial statement was prepared by employees of Walters plc. Note 1: New styles and rapidly changing consumer preferences resulted in a 71,500 loss on the disposal of discontinued...
-
On July 10, 201X, Happy Corporation issued 3,100 shares of common stock with a par value of $99 in exchange for equipment with a fair market value of $321,000. Journalize the appropriate entry.
-
Refer to the information in Exercise 16-6. Assume that Fields uses the FIFO method of process costing. 1. Calculate the equivalent units of production for the forming department. 2. Calculate the...
-
A. Steve Jackson (birthdate December 13, 1965) is a single taxpayer living at 3215 Pacific Dr., Apt. B, Pacific Beach, CA 92109. His Social Security number is 465-88-9415. In 2018, Steves earnings...
-
Steve consumes two goods, tacos, T, and Red Bull soda, R. His income is $60 per week, the price of tacos is $3 and the price of Red Bull is $2. [2'] A) What is the equation for his budget line?...
-
A 40-m-long, 4-in. commercial steel pipe connects reservoirs A and Bas shown in Figure P4.1.6. Determine the minimum pressure (P0) that would keep the pressure head throughout the pipe positive....
-
(1 point) Taylor and MacLaurin Series: Compute the Taylor Series below. WeBWorK does not understand factorials, so you will need to enter numerical values. For example, enter "1/6" instead of "1/3!"....
-
How will a business property's basis be adjusted as a result of a casualty loss?
-
How can a vacation home become rental property? What is the difference between rental property and personal residence?
-
For an individual taxpayer, expenses connected with rents and royalties are normally deducted: a. For AGI b. From AGI c. Either for or from AGI d. For AGI but limited to a maximum percentage amount
-
An ordinary trade or business expenditure is one which is: a. Reasonable in amount b, Commonly incurred by other businesses c. Appropriate for a particular business d. Not a capital expenditure
-
What consequences does a taxpayer face when one of several activities is no longer a passive activity?
-
John Smith is vice president of Great Manor Country Club. One of his responsibilities is to screen potential new members. He finds some research that people whose diet is highly varied are more...
-
Which internal control principle is especially diffi cult for small organizations to implement? Why?
-
Describe the ways in which the nature of revenue in not-for-profit organizations can differ from the nature of revenue in business enterprises.
-
How does a parent companys total net assets amount differ under consolidated reporting as compared to equity reporting for a subsidiary?
-
On August 15, 20X1, the European Exchange Club (EEC) was formed in an effort to create a united social group out of several separate regional clubs in the vicinity of the city of Decker, located in...
-
Explain the structure, current trends, and future prospects of the banking industry.
-
Banks face several types of risk in day-to-day business. They include: a. Liquidity riskthe risk that customers will demand cash immediately. i. Liability-side liquidity risk arises from deposit...
-
Define the term quality .
Study smarter with the SolutionInn App