Urban Outfitters Linear Programming/Transportation Model Cost Data To New York, NY Los Angeles, CA Chicago, IL Houston, TX Phoenix, AZ Phi From \begin{tabular}{|l|r|rrr|r|} \hline Indianapolis, IN & 708 & 2,067 & 182 & 1,014 & 1,698 \\ \hline Sioux Falls, SD & 1,361 & 1,633 & 573 & 1,075 & 1,436 \\ \hline Charlotte, NC & 623 & 2,411 & 754 & 1,036 & 2,042 \\ \hline Austin, TX & 1,743 & 1,377 & 1,162 & 165 & 1,006 \\ \hline Seattle, WA & 2,851 & 1,136 & 2,064 & 2,315 & 1,415 \\ \hline Jacksonville, FL & 930 & 2,416 & 1,065 & 870 & 2,044 \\ \hline \end{tabular} To New York, NY Los Angeles, CA Chicago, IL Houston, TX Pheonix, AZ Philic Indianapolis, IN Sioux Falls, SD Charlotte, NC Austin, TX Seattle, WA Jacksonville, FL Total Received Demand >= >= >= >= >= >= Total Distance Traveled es, CA Chicago, IL Houston, TX Pheonix, AZ Philidelphia, PA San Antonio, TX San Diego, CA Dallas, TX San Jose, CA Colu \begin{tabular}{|r|r|r|r|r|r|} \hline Jose, CA & Columbus, OH & Denver, CO & Nashville, TN & Boston, MA & \multicolumn{2}{l|}{ Detroit, MI } \\ \hline 2,303 & 175 & 1,084 & 289 & 950 & 286 \\ \hline 1,778 & 913 & 622 & 914 & 1,555 & 858 \\ \hline 2,667 & 425 & 1,562 & 408 & 836 & 628 \\ \hline 1,716 & 1,234 & 918 & 858 & 1,963 & 1,381 \\ \hline 839 & 2,419 & 1,304 & 2,387 & 3,045 & 2,349 \\ \hline 2,686 & 807 & 1,749 & 595 & 1,143 & 1,010 \\ \hline \end{tabular} tan Jose, CA Supply >= Urban Outfitters Linear Programming/Transportation Model Cost Data To New York, NY Los Angeles, CA Chicago, IL Houston, TX Phoenix, AZ Phi From \begin{tabular}{|l|r|rrr|r|} \hline Indianapolis, IN & 708 & 2,067 & 182 & 1,014 & 1,698 \\ \hline Sioux Falls, SD & 1,361 & 1,633 & 573 & 1,075 & 1,436 \\ \hline Charlotte, NC & 623 & 2,411 & 754 & 1,036 & 2,042 \\ \hline Austin, TX & 1,743 & 1,377 & 1,162 & 165 & 1,006 \\ \hline Seattle, WA & 2,851 & 1,136 & 2,064 & 2,315 & 1,415 \\ \hline Jacksonville, FL & 930 & 2,416 & 1,065 & 870 & 2,044 \\ \hline \end{tabular} To New York, NY Los Angeles, CA Chicago, IL Houston, TX Pheonix, AZ Philic Indianapolis, IN Sioux Falls, SD Charlotte, NC Austin, TX Seattle, WA Jacksonville, FL Total Received Demand >= >= >= >= >= >= Total Distance Traveled es, CA Chicago, IL Houston, TX Pheonix, AZ Philidelphia, PA San Antonio, TX San Diego, CA Dallas, TX San Jose, CA Colu \begin{tabular}{|r|r|r|r|r|r|} \hline Jose, CA & Columbus, OH & Denver, CO & Nashville, TN & Boston, MA & \multicolumn{2}{l|}{ Detroit, MI } \\ \hline 2,303 & 175 & 1,084 & 289 & 950 & 286 \\ \hline 1,778 & 913 & 622 & 914 & 1,555 & 858 \\ \hline 2,667 & 425 & 1,562 & 408 & 836 & 628 \\ \hline 1,716 & 1,234 & 918 & 858 & 1,963 & 1,381 \\ \hline 839 & 2,419 & 1,304 & 2,387 & 3,045 & 2,349 \\ \hline 2,686 & 807 & 1,749 & 595 & 1,143 & 1,010 \\ \hline \end{tabular} tan Jose, CA Supply >=
