Use less complex words to summarize the following: The experiment was designed to test the influence of certain conditions on cheating, using a 2x2 analysis of variance through RAT. The findings showed a significant influence of these conditions on cheating. The statistical results showed that F (1, 204) = 10.23, p = .002, p 2 = .048, indicating a significant effect. Additionally, the interaction between the variables also showed a significant impact, with F (1, 204) = 4.08, p = .045, p 2 = .02. However, in the prime condition where F is less than 1, the RAT performance did not vary in the opaque condition. In the transparent condition, participants showed more creativity in the rule-breaking prime compared to the neutral prime condition. This was statistically significant with F (1,204) =5.29, p=0.023, indicating that creativity was higher in the rule-breaking condition than in the neutral prime condition. In conclusion, the hypothesis was disproved by the experiment results, showing that the conditions under study had a notable influence on cheating, and that participants were more creative in rule-breaking conditions than in neutral ones