Question: Use the numerical example that I have attached to explain that a negligence rule is more efficient than the strict liability when precautions are needed

 Use the numerical example that I have attached to explain thata negligence rule is more efficient than the strict liability when precautionsare needed on both injurer & victim (bilaterally) - please calculate theresult \fStrict Liability Ca : cost of injurer. Ci = W .X + Doc) - A . Injurer is responsible of A SinceCi = SC Injurer will choose Efficient 14:16Activity Lever Considered assume [A = 10", P - THX- CHXV) Cita W * = W

Use the numerical example that I have attached to explain that a negligence rule is more efficient than the strict liability when precautions are needed on both injurer & victim (bilaterally) - please calculate the result

v = Wa - 1 optimal Level of precautions activity D F.O. C Xi = XV - a -0 ( HX : )+ = 10 12 Xi = 103 -1= 989 social optimal FX = a * Negligence on Injurer + ward Wi X .+ wa-a Ki = 2,* = 958 9=0Negligence on Victim Cv =( W v x v + P (xixu. a ) A, ifxuimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribed

\fStrict Liability Ca : cost of injurer. Ci = W . X + Doc) - A . Injurer is responsible of A Since Ci = SC Injurer will choose Efficient 14:16Activity Lever Considered assume [ A = 10", P - THX- CHXV) Cita W * = W v = Wa - 1 optimal Level of precautions activity D F. O. C Xi = XV - a -0 ( HX : ) + = 10 12 Xi = 103 -1= 989 social optimal F X = a * Negligence on Injurer + ward Wi X . + wa-a Ki = 2,* = 958 9=0Negligence on Victim Cv = ( W v x v + P (xixu. a ) A, if xu

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Mathematics Questions!