use the references below to complete the table:

Complete the evidence table fully for these articles, providing all the required information.Include this table as an appendix to your assessment.

References

Alonderien, R., Mller, R., Pilkien, M., imkonis, S., & Chmieliauskas, A. (2020). Transitions in balanced leadership in projects: The case of horizontal leaders. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(6), 3339-3351.

Alqudah, I. H., Carballo-Penela, A., & Ruzo-Sanmartn, E. (2022). High-performance human resource management practices and readiness for change: An integrative model including affective commitment, employees' performance, and the moderating role of hierarchy culture. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 28(1), 100177.

Levine, D. M., Chalasani, R., Linder, J. A., & Landon, B. E. (2022). Association of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act with ambulatory quality, patient experience, utilization, and cost, 2014-2016. JAMA network open, 5(6), e2218167-e2218167.

Tear, M. J., Reader, T. W., Shorrock, S., & Kirwan, B. (2020). Safety culture and power: Interactions between perceptions of safety culture, organisational hierarchy, and national culture. Safety science, 121, 550-561.

Tran, Q. H. (2021). Organisational culture, leadership behaviour and job satisfaction in the Vietnam context. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 29(1), 136-154.

Citation	Conceptual Framework	Design/ Method	Sample/ Setting	Major Variables Studied and their Definitions	Measurement	Data Analysis	Findings	Appraisal: Worth to Practice
EXAMPLE Harne-Britner et al. (2011)	Change theory in combination with aspects of behavioral, social science, and organizational theories by Bandura, Skinner, and Lewin	Quantitative research Quasi-experimental study Random assignment of 3 nursing units into 2 experimental groups and 1 control group Aims of the study were to determine (1) the effectiveness of educational and behavioral interventions on improving HH adherence; (2) whether improvements in HH adherence were sustained 6 months post intervention; and (3) the relationships between HH adherence and HAI rates on study units.	RNs and patient care assistants (PCAs) from 3 medical-surgical units within an urban health care system in Pennsylvania, USA A total of 1203 observations (633 RNs and 570 PCAs) were completed	The control group received education in the form of a self-study module with a pre- and posttest. The experimental groups received the same education plus behavioral interventions. The Positive Reinforcement Experimental group's behavioral interventions included individual and unit rewards for improved HH adherence and unit-based recognition by peers on a sticker chart. The Risk of Nonadherence Experimental group received additional educational sessions about microorganisms that are transmitted via hands OBSERVATION =Watching one person having direct contact with a patient or handling patient equipment. CLEANED HANDS = Washed at a sink and/or used alcohol gel from a dispenser (e.g., wall mounted, pocket-sized, or a bottle that is not wall mounted) before or after having direct contact with a patient or handling patient equipment. AWARE OF MONITORING: You told the person you're going to observe them or they verbally acknowledge that you are monitoring them	18 data collection periods per nursing unit Data were collected each month during 3 time frames (5 AM-7 AM, 7:30 AM-9:30 AM, and 3:30 PM-5:30 PM) reflecting high work volume to ensure a representative sample	SPSS Statistics, Version 17.0 Chi-square analysis was used to determine whether the 3 nursing units had similar HH adherence rates before any intervention. The Fisher exact test was employed to determine whether the change in adherence rates on each unit was statistically significant. Reported these data to the RN and PCA staff at monthly staff- and unit based quality meetings	Education paired with positive reinforcement behavioral interventions improved HH adherence after the first month (2 = 4.27; P = .039); but the improvement was not sustained over 6 months. There were no differences in infection rates between the treatment and control groups.	Strengths: -Randomized control group -Large sample size Weaknesses: -Length of study Ranking: Level II Valid yes Reliable yes Applicable yes Overall rank: High