Use the references provided to integrate in -text citations into the essay below where applicable and essay to be written to 350-word count. Rephrase essay to highest academic standard:

Winston, B.E. & Patterson, K. (2006) An integrative definition of Leadership. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 1(2), pp. 6-66. Available at:http://www.rodrigoselback.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/An-Integrative-Definition-of-Leadership.pdf

Karmel, B. (1978). Leadership: A challenge to traditional research methods and assumptions.Academy of Management Review,3(3), 475-482.

Barrow, J. C. (1977). The variables of leadership: A review and conceptual framework.Academy of management Review,2(2), 231-251.

Fairholm, M. R., & Fairholm, G. W. (2009).Understanding leadership perspectives: Theoretical and practical approaches. Springer Science & Business Media.

Harrison, C. (2017).Leadership theory and research: A critical approach to new and existing paradigms. Springer.

Chemers, M. M., & Ayman, R. E. (1993).Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions. Academic Press.

Bhattacharyya, S. S., & Jha, S. (2018). Literature review of leadership theories.Strategic Leadership Models and Theories: Indian Perspectives, 7-18.

Posner, B. Z., & Kouzes, J. M. (1990). Leadership practices: An alternative to the psychological perspective.

Yukl, G. (1989). Managerial leadership: A review of theory and research.Journal of management,15(2), 251-289.

Yammarino, F. (2013). Leadership: Past, present, and future.Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies,20(2), 149-155.

1. What are the aim and objectives of the article?

Aim: The primary aim of Winston and Patterson (2006) is to develop a comprehensive and integrative definition of leadership that synthesizes the various fragmented definitions existing across academic and practical literature. The authors seek to bring clarity and cohesion to the concept of leadership by integrating multiple perspectives into a unified framework.

Objectives: To achieve this aim, the article sets out the following objectives:

1. To review and analyze over 90 existing definitions of leadership found in scholarly literature.
2. To identify common elements, themes, and conceptual distinctions within those definitions.
3. To propose a new, integrative definition that captures the complexity of leadership while remaining applicable across contexts.
4. To clarify the functions and characteristics that distinguish leadership from related concepts such as management or influence.

ii. Critically discuss how the research objectives of the article help the researcher address the aim of the research.

The objectives are methodically structured to directly support the overarching aim of formulating an integrative definition of leadership. First, the comprehensive review of over 90 definitions offers a rigorous foundation for understanding the fragmented state of leadership discourse. By surveying such a broad scope of literature, the authors ensure that the integrative definition is grounded in existing academic thought rather than purely subjective reasoning.

Second, the identification of commonalities and distinctions among definitions allows the researchers to engage in thematic synthesis. This step is essential for distilling core elements of leadershipsuch as influence, vision, values, and follower developmentthat recur across definitions. This analytical process supports the development of a holistic and multidimensional understanding of leadership.

Third, by proposing a new definition that incorporates cognitive, behavioral, and relational components, the researchers address not only the functional aspects of leadership but also its ethical and developmental dimensions. The definition they presentemphasizing influence, values alignment, vision, and follower growthcaptures both the what and how of leadership practice.

Lastly, the distinction between leadership and related constructs (e.g., management or authority) adds conceptual clarity, strengthening the definition's academic and practical utility.

Overall, each objective functions as a logical and necessary step toward fulfilling the article's aim. The structured approach, rooted in comprehensive literature analysis, enables the authors to craft a robust and versatile definition, thereby addressing a longstanding challenge in leadership studies.