Using the Nobel Prize SPARQL endpoint, I can query for winners of the literature prize using this code: PREFIX nobel: chttp://data.nobelprize.org/terms/> PREFIX rdf: http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-nsats PREFIX rdfs: shttp://wWow3.org/200e/e1/rdf +schenats SELECT DISTINCT Iname ?year WHERE [ Pperson rdfs:label ?name; nobelinobelprize ?prize. Tprize nobel:year ?year; nobel:category nobeliLiterature. J ORDER BY ?year In the nobel ontology (resolved from the prefix nobel: above), the nobel:category predicate is defined With: nobelicategory rdfs:range nobeli: Category. And nobelicategory is defined with: nobel:category ow1;oneof (nobelichemistry nobel:Physics nobel:Litterature nobel: Peace nobel:Economic_Sciences nobel: Physiology_or Hedicin ). I notice that my query has nobel: literstupe with one 't', but the ontology spells it with two 't's. What difference will this make for my query? Select ALL valid answers a. If the data is invalid based on the ontology, the query will not run. b. If the query uses terms that are not defined in the ontology, the query will not run. c. If nobeli Literature was defined anywhere on the web as equivalent to or a subclass of nobel: Licterature, the data matching this query would be valid. d. If the data is invalid based on the ontology, the query will be unaffected. salatainers of tie neneipsce, onfy they have the outharity. f. If the query uses terms that are not defined in the ontology, the query will be unaffected. 9 . If the data is valid according to the ontology, my search will give 0 results