using this structure, use the evidence portion that I filled out to make an updated topic sentence, relate to the paper prompt above, and argument. the argument should be why it is bad ARGUMENT 2 - Second Danger of Pursuing a Litigation Strategy Around Climate Change TOPIC SENTENCE: State each of your arguments in a single clear sentence at the start of your paragraph (topic sentence). The reader shouldn't have to read deep into the paragraph to figure out your point. They should be able to read your thesis sentence and topic sentences alone and have a clear sense of your overall argument. EVIDENCE: Levitsky (2005) claims that when social movements turn to the courts, they surrender control over their demands to a judicial system that interprets rights in ways that align with existing social and political structures (Levitsky, 2005). To supplement this, Levitsky (2015) and Rosenberg (1991) further claim that, from a positivist perspective, law impacts social movements only when judicial rulings produce direct, immediate, and measurable changes in targeted behaviors (Levitsky, 2015; Rosenberg, 1991). RELATE: Apply the social science evidence to the facts of this case. 1-2 complete sentences ARGUMENT: Bring the reader back to your overall argument. How does this argument relate to your thesis? 1 complete sentence