Question: Utilitarianism is often described as agent agnostic which means that no one individual is more or less important than any other, only the amount of

Utilitarianism is often described as agent agnostic which means that no one individual is more or less important than any other, only the amount of happiness/eudemonia/utility they generate is relevant. Do you think it is always (ethically) reasonable to expect a person to choose a course of action that will cause misery to those they care about in order to create more total happiness for strangers?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!