Video links is given below

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fvb1e4-YgRE

"Gallileo V" Analysis 1. How would you characterize the two introductions that were prepared for President Bartlett to deliver? 2. In your opinion, was NASA's or the White House version better? Why? 3. How did the NASA public affairs officer and Sam Seaborn approach their task differently? How did they approach it the same, if at all? 4. Why is it important that President Bartlett chides NASA's public affairs person that "unique means one of a kind, something can't be very unique" and "nor can it be extremely historic?" What lessons do you draw from that exchange? "Gallileo V" Analysis 1. How would you characterize the two introductions that were prepared for President Bartlett to deliver? 2. In your opinion, was NASA's or the White House version better? Why? 3. How did the NASA public affairs officer and Sam Seaborn approach their task differently? How did they approach it the same, if at all? 4. Why is it important that President Bartlett chides NASA's public affairs person that "unique means one of a kind, something can't be very unique" and "nor can it be extremely historic?" What lessons do you draw from that exchange