What did Lewis Wolpert mean when he stated that reliable scientific knowledge is value-free and has no
Fantastic news! We've Found the answer you've been seeking!
Question:
What did Lewis Wolpert mean when he stated that ‘reliable scientific knowledge is value-free and has no moral or ethical value’ (p. 1254)?
Why is the conflation of science and technology a serious problem according to Wolpert?
How is the social responsibility of scientists distinct from those of ordinary citizens? Cite two specific situations where this distinction become apparent.
How is Eugenics a classic example of the perversion of scientific knowledge?
Why is there a need to encourage ordinary citizens to learn more about science?
Related Book For
Posted Date: