What direction should I head in to answer this question? Last Assignment and I need to Ace to pass for the semester! Any help would be great thanx!

quick access, place your bookmarks here on the bookmarks bar Import bookmarks now Here are the two cases: Case 1 Imbriale V. Amtrak John Stockridge told Lou Imbriale that he could buy gold that had been smuggled out of Vietnam by American soldiers who now sought to sell it. Imbriale agreed to purchase the gold for $607,000. To pay for it Imbriale placed $607,000 in cash in a locked briefcase, which was then placed in a suitcase provided by Stockridge that had a combination lock. Both men knew the combination. They then went to the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Amtrak station, where Imbriale placed the suitcase in a coin-operated locker owned and operated by National Storage Company, Inc. Imbriale kept the key. Shortly thereafter, a Stockridge accomplice told an employee of the Amtrak station that he had lost the key to his locker. The employee opened the locker with a master key. When the man opened the combination lock to the briefcase, the employee released the suitcase to him. When Stockridge did not contact Imbriale as planned to permit him to inspect the gold, Imbriale discovered the locker was empty. Imbriale sued Amtrak and National Storage for damages. The case revolved around whether there was a bailment. How do you think the court found? Why? Case 2 quick access, place your bookmarks here on the bookmarks bar Import bookmarks now Here are the two cases: Case 1 Imbriale V. Amtrak John Stockridge told Lou Imbriale that he could buy gold that had been smuggled out of Vietnam by American soldiers who now sought to sell it. Imbriale agreed to purchase the gold for $607,000. To pay for it Imbriale placed $607,000 in cash in a locked briefcase, which was then placed in a suitcase provided by Stockridge that had a combination lock. Both men knew the combination. They then went to the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Amtrak station, where Imbriale placed the suitcase in a coin-operated locker owned and operated by National Storage Company, Inc. Imbriale kept the key. Shortly thereafter, a Stockridge accomplice told an employee of the Amtrak station that he had lost the key to his locker. The employee opened the locker with a master key. When the man opened the combination lock to the briefcase, the employee released the suitcase to him. When Stockridge did not contact Imbriale as planned to permit him to inspect the gold, Imbriale discovered the locker was empty. Imbriale sued Amtrak and National Storage for damages. The case revolved around whether there was a bailment. How do you think the court found? Why? Case 2