Question: what do you think uber should do in response to the bill introduced by susan bonilla and why? To be accepted, the paper must meet
what do you think uber should do in response to the bill introduced by susan bonilla and why?
- To be accepted, the paper must meet all the conditions in the section "Written assignments" of the syllabus.
- To be accepted, the paper must be properly cited as described in the section "Academic honestyplagiarism" of the syllabus.
- To be accepted, the paper must be no longer than two pages, which means its final punctuation mark is on p. 3 if there is a cover page, or on p. 2 if not. The list of references may be on the following page.
At around 8 p.. on a New Year's Eve, a mother and her two young children were walking home in San Francisco. At a busy intersection, the family waited for the walk" signal and then started across the street. Just then, an SUV made a right turn, strikine all three members of the family in the crosswalk. The mother and ber Syear old son were seriously injured. Her 6 year old daughter was killed. The man behind the wheel of the SUV identitled himself as a driver for the rido hailing service Uber Uber immediately distanced itself from the tragedy, saying that the driver was not providing services on the Uber system at the time of the accident. The family's attorney contested this saying that the driver was loped onto the Uber application appeared on the systems available to accept a rider, and was interacting with his device when the struck the mother and children In other words, the tragic incident had apparently occurred during the app opp the driver was on the road with his Uber application activated, but had not yet connected with or picked up a rider. So, who was responsible, the driver or the ride-hailing service! Uber was, in the words of a New York Times columnist, "the hottest, most valuable technology startup on the planet. The company wat founded in 2009 as "everyone's private driver providing a premium town car service that could be summoned online. In 2012. it rolled out UberX. a service that enabled nonprofessional drivers to use their own vehicles to transport riders. Customers could use the the app to hail a car, connect with a willing driver, watch the vehicle approach on a map.pay their faire, and receive a receipt all on their smartphone. Uber provided the technology and took a commission on each transaction Uber's disruptive business model caught on rapidly. By 2014. Uber's ride sharing service had spread to more than 120 cities in 36 contre In the United States, the service could reach 17 million people with an average pickup time of less than 10 minutes Demand was growing so fast that Uber was scrambling to recruit 20,000 new drivers, whom Uber called transportation entrepreneurs every month Plato investors were enthusiastic about the company's prospects: Uber had attracted $1.2 billion in funding and was valued at $18.2 billion Drivers who partnered with Uber had the flexibility to drive when and as much as they wished. They could also nuke a decent The 24 living the median annual income for its full time drivers in San Francisco, for sample, was about $1.000. But the sound risk. In the event of an accident. Uber instructed its drivers to submit a claim to their personal insurance carrier ist, it was deniet, Uber ?) DIM NO At around 8 p.. on a New Year's Eve, a mother and her two young children were walking home in San Francisco. At a busy intersection, the family waited for the walk" signal and then started across the street. Just then, an SUV made a right turn, strikine all three members of the family in the crosswalk. The mother and ber Syear old son were seriously injured. Her 6 year old daughter was killed. The man behind the wheel of the SUV identitled himself as a driver for the rido hailing service Uber Uber immediately distanced itself from the tragedy, saying that the driver was not providing services on the Uber system at the time of the accident. The family's attorney contested this saying that the driver was loped onto the Uber application appeared on the systems available to accept a rider, and was interacting with his device when the struck the mother and children In other words, the tragic incident had apparently occurred during the app opp the driver was on the road with his Uber application activated, but had not yet connected with or picked up a rider. So, who was responsible, the driver or the ride-hailing service! Uber was, in the words of a New York Times columnist, "the hottest, most valuable technology startup on the planet. The company wat founded in 2009 as "everyone's private driver providing a premium town car service that could be summoned online. In 2012. it rolled out UberX. a service that enabled nonprofessional drivers to use their own vehicles to transport riders. Customers could use the the app to hail a car, connect with a willing driver, watch the vehicle approach on a map.pay their faire, and receive a receipt all on their smartphone. Uber provided the technology and took a commission on each transaction Uber's disruptive business model caught on rapidly. By 2014. Uber's ride sharing service had spread to more than 120 cities in 36 contre In the United States, the service could reach 17 million people with an average pickup time of less than 10 minutes Demand was growing so fast that Uber was scrambling to recruit 20,000 new drivers, whom Uber called transportation entrepreneurs every month Plato investors were enthusiastic about the company's prospects: Uber had attracted $1.2 billion in funding and was valued at $18.2 billion Drivers who partnered with Uber had the flexibility to drive when and as much as they wished. They could also nuke a decent The 24 living the median annual income for its full time drivers in San Francisco, for sample, was about $1.000. But the sound risk. In the event of an accident. Uber instructed its drivers to submit a claim to their personal insurance carrier ist, it was deniet, Uber ?) DIM NO