Question: What does this statement ofhis conduct was not a direct consequence of sending it in the Huth v Huth [1915] mean? Court of Appeal held
What does this statement of"his conduct was not a direct consequence of sending it" in the Huth v Huth [1915] mean?
Court of Appeal held that there was no publication even though the envelope was unsealed; it was not part of the butler's duty to open the letter and his conduct was not a direct consequence of sending it. [1915] 3 K.B. 32.
Tort Law - Defamation - Publication of 3rd Party
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
