Question: What does this statement ofhis conduct was not a direct consequence of sending it in the Huth v Huth [1915] mean? Court of Appeal held

What does this statement of"his conduct was not a direct consequence of sending it" in the Huth v Huth [1915] mean?

Court of Appeal held that there was no publication even though the envelope was unsealed; it was not part of the butler's duty to open the letter and his conduct was not a direct consequence of sending it. [1915] 3 K.B. 32.

Tort Law - Defamation - Publication of 3rd Party

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Law Questions!