what footnote can I add for this: In deciding how the case would ultimately be ruled, one factor used as a rationale for the court's decision was the precedent established in the landmark case of Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972), which ultimately demonstrated that Amish parents had the right to withdraw their children from high school for religious reasons. The Mahmoud court recognized that the circumstances surrounding the burden imposed on religious exercise in this case showed similarities and had the same character as Yoder, except for the difference in scope, and triggered a strict scrutiny analysis. Under strict scrutiny, the highest standard of judicial review applied to legislation (Strict Scrutiny, n.d.), requiring the government to prove its policy serves a compelling interest and is narrowly tailored. In this case, strict scrutiny was not satisfied even though the court recognized the school's intent to create and foster a safe and conducive learning environment; the court found that the no-opt policy was not necessary to achieve that specific goal