What is being compared in this analogical argument? Is it weak or strong? Explain your answer. Are there any significant differences and factors between the things being compared, animals and human beings, that would make this argument weak? Explain your answer thoroughly (a 5.5-point question).

Animals are like human beings. They feel pain and pleasure and are part of the same chain of evolution. It is wrong to eat human beings, so it must be wrong to eat animals.