Question: What is wrong with the following abstract class definition? class Shape { public: virtual double print() const; double area() const { return base * height;
What is wrong with the following abstract class definition? class Shape { public: virtual double print() const; double area() const { return base * height; } private: float base; float height; }
a) There is no pure virtual function.
b) There is a non-virtual function.
c) Private variables are being accessed by a public function.
d) Nothing wrong.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
