What moral issues does the Pinto case ratse?

Suppose Ford officials were asked to justify their decision. What moral principles do you think they would invoke? Assess Ford's handling of the Pinto from the perspective of each of the moral theories discussed in this chapter.

Uilitarians would say that jeopardizing motorists does not by itseif make Ford's action morally objectionable. The only morally relevant matter is whether ford gave equal consideration to the interests of each affected party. Do you think Ford did this?

Is cost$-$benefit analysis a legitimate tool? What role, if any, shoiald it play in moral deliberation? Critically assess the example of cont$-$henefit analysis given in the case study, Is there anything unsatisfactory about in$?$ Could it have been improved upen in same way?