What was the court's CONCLUSION $($holding$,$ decision$)$ in the Philibert v Klusner case?

For Defendant. In light of the Restatement $($Third$)$ test, plaintiffs have failed to state a claim for recovery of emotional distress.

For Plaintiffs. In light of the "zone of danger" test, plaintiffs have stated a negligence claim for recovery of emotional distress damage.

For Plaintiffs. In light of the Restatement $($Third$)$ test, plaintiffs have stated a negligence claim for recovery of emotional distress damage.

For Defendant. In light of the "impact test", plaintiffs have failed to state a claim for recovery of emotional distress.