Question: What was the court's ruling in the Thyssen v . Eurounity case in the text? a . the carrier was protected against responsibility for cargo

What was the court's ruling in the Thyssen v. Eurounity case in the text?
a. the carrier was protected against responsibility for cargo loss under COGSA's
peril of the sea defense.
b. the carrier was liable for cargo loss due to the unseaworthiness of the vessel.
c. the weather conditions were not severe enough to allow the carrier protection
under COGSA's peril of the sea defense.
d. the carrier was exonerated because of an error in the navigation of the vessel.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!

Q:

PART 2 Salmons Stores operates a national chain of women's apparel stores. Five thousand copies of an expensive four-color sales catalog have been printed, and each catalog includes a coupon that...

Q:

Shaver (1) A. Briefly describe the relevant background facts of the case; B. Identify the relevant legal question(s) presented to the court; C. Identify the holding (decision) of the court. D....

Q:

Chapter 16 Passenger Transport Law INTRODUCTION 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Transport law is a complex area of law covering the carriage (transport) of passengers and their luggage, as well as the carriage...

Q:

Case brief on No. 07-1239 Supreme Court of the United States Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc. 555 U.S. 7 (2008) 129 S. Ct. 365 172 L. Ed. 2d 249 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 547 Decided Nov 12,...

Q:

What was the court's ruling in the GERMANIC case in the text? a . the carrier was protected against responsibility for cargo loss under COGSA's error in management defense. . b . the carrier was...

Q:

Fishman (1) Briefly describe the relevant background facts of the case; (2) Identify the relevant legal question(s) presented to the court; (3) Identify the holding (decision) of the court. (4)...

Q:

Institute of London (1) Briefly describe the relevant background facts of the case; (2) Identify the relevant legal question(s) presented to the court; (3) Identify the holding (decision) of the...

Q:

IN REGARDS TO THE THRE CASES INCLUDED, what is the analysis of each case? What is the conflict in Complex Asbestos ? What is the conflict in Phoenix ? What is the conflict in Lamb ? explain the heart...

Q:

Please brief United States v. Windsor on pages 319-323 in the textbook. I type the text below. Justice Kennedydelivered the opinion of the Court. Two women then resident in New York were marriedin a...

Q:

In the case I have included below, Did Vogel actually work on any of the cases from which his employer Harrison is being disqualified? Did Vogel possess any confidential information about these...

Q:

IN REGARDS TO THE FOUR CASES INCLUDED, what is the analysis of each case? What is the conflict in Complex Asbestos ? What is the conflict in Phoenix ? What is the conflict in Lamb ? explain the heart...

Q:

For the following four cases, use the expanded accounting equation to compute the missingquantity. Liabilities Retained Earnings Capital Stock Assets Case A Case B $16,000 $34,000 $ 9,500 3,100...

Q:

If Mark has $52,000.00 to invest in an investment that makes fixed monthly payments of $900.00, how many monthly payments will he receive if he receives his first fixed monthly payment today and his...

Q:

True or False organizational and start-up expenses does NOT create a permanent book-tax difference

Q:

Make a statement of cashflows in good form. X X M Inbox 2,50 x M Logistics : * Course: ST: X|MyDrive- x B Group 2 Pex Course ID: Cth Moodle X C Get HomeX C Photos Screx Interview X + ....