What will be the best reply for this post?

They're many different ethical guidelines an evaluator within criminal justice should consider when completing different program and policy evaluations. Confidentiality and privacy is very important to help protect identities and the personal data of individuals. Transparency is important because it showcases clear and direct parts of the evaluation that display any types of limitations, different funding sources, and areas that may need revisions. Ethical guidelines hold stake holders and policy makers accountable and protects the rights of everyone involved in the policy or programs. Most importantly when developing or implementing programs or policies, it is important as an evaluator to follow ethical principles that help safeguard rights, promote justice, and instill trust. As policies and programs base their goals from researched data, evaluators should make sure that the program also follows ethical data practices and avoid any type of bias or conflict of interest. As an evaluator it is important to make sure that policies of program are sustainable for a long term impact. During the design evaluation, methods, and data collections phase an evaluator adhering to the ethical guidelines are very critical. During these stages the foundation of the evaluation is important to make sure that the evaluation is valid, fair, and respects all rights. Evaluators must make sure that stakeholders showcase cultural competence, relevance, and equity during the design phase. In the methodology phase, some ethical guidelines to consider as an evaluator are ethical sensitivity to avoid re-dramatization, contextual appropriateness, fairness, and data ethics planning. The evaluator also holds a significant responsponsibiliy for the logistical effectiveness during the process of organizing people, resources, and finances. Making sure the use of fund are being used correctly, prioritizing cost cutting if need be, and being very transparent in who is funding program and policies and the allocations of funds. When organizing people throughout the policies and programs, avoiding the risk of co-erocion is vital in this process because it's important to allow for others to be involved with reasonable compensation. As an evaluator interprets or communicate results, they should always relay information from a non bias stand point and allows for clear, direct, and transparent information of everything regarding the policy or program.Among all, evaluators should uphold their position to high regards by following ethical guidelines that ensure that their work is credible and reliable.