what would you respond to this?

Thank you for your post. Reading your post, I think you agree that both theoretical and experimental probability can be trusted, while in myown case, I disagreed. I think theoretical probability cannot be trusted because the result of the theoretical is based on what couldhappened in an ideal situation. We know that coin have only two sides, if a coin is flip up, it is likely that it can land heads or tails. Therefore,the theoretical probability of getting tail is 1 out of 2. But what if you flip the coin two time or more and it landed on the same side head ortail? Should we consider that to be true? Of course not. Experimental probability on the other hand relies on performing the actualexperiments by recording a series of occurrence of an event, in which the result will always unpredictable. I think both theoretical andexperimental probability just describes how likely something could occur, either in a normal situation, or in any situation, and I thinkpredicting a situation should not be considered as the truth, and so, it should not be trusted.