When asked to evaluate the two candidates for the position presented, it is important to understand the differences in the rational and intuitive decision$-$making models. With the rational decision$-$making model, there are several steps to take to arrive at a sound decision. This includes identifying the problem, determining what criteria will be utilized to arrive at a decision, weighing the options, weighing pros and cons, determining the scope of the decision, making a choice, and acting on that decision. On the other hand, intuitive decision$-$making is based on concepts, experience, and patterns.

When evaluating Myra, a $15-$year veteran with the company, it is almost intuitive to give her a shot with the promotion because she is well$-$rounded with the knowledge of the pet supply company. Myra also embodies the organization's culture and has worked very diligently to get to this step in her career. On the downside, Myra is not well versed in the technological aspect that this position demands, but she is a fast learner. Where intuition could allow us to select Myra, it is natural to consider Michael with an intuitive approach as well due to his expertise with the technological side of this position. Michael has successfully earned a degree in this field of study and has prior experience with another company so that he can easily launch the online company.

On the other hand, when you dive into the rational decision$-$making process, it is difficult to select a candidate where they both have pros and cons to weigh. If I were the manager$/$leader making this decision, I would recommend utilizing the rational decision model where things are analyzed more in$-$depth. It is also advised to include and consider the ideas of other managers$/$leaders where they may have different perspectives on each candidate