When dealing with multiple issues in a client's case, address each issue separately and completely before proceeding to the next issue.

	a.	True
	b.	False

2.The identification of the issue determines which direction the research will take.

	a.	True
	b.	False

3.If the issue is misidentified, malpractice may result, because the client is billed for a service not requested.

	a.	True
	b.	False

4.The facts component of an issue is composed of the key facts and sufficient background facts to identify the context of the dispute.

	a.	True
	b.	False

5.A narrow statement of the issue fails to inform the researcher of the specific factual context of the dispute.

	a.	True
	b.	False

6.The identification of the issue:

	a.	Is the first step of the legal analysis process
	b.	Is the most important task that a researcher faces when engaging in legal analysis
	c.	Determines the direction that the research will take
	d.	May result in malpractice if it is misidentified
	e.	All of the above
	f.	Answers a, b, and c above
	g.	Answers a and b above

7.The issue in a client's case is composed of which of the following parts?

	a.	Sufficient background facts to identify the context of the dispute
	b.	Key facts
	c.	The legal question
	d.	The applicable law
	e.	All of the above
	f.	Answers b, c, and d above

8.The identification of the issue(s) in a client's case requires the:

	a.	Identification of the general areas of law involved
	b.	Identification of the elements of the cause(s) of action
	c.	Identification of the key and background facts
	d.	Assembly of the issue
	e.	All of the above
	f.	Answers a, b, and d above
	g.	Answers b and d above

9.In regard to the identification of the issue(s) in a court opinion:

	a.	When the case has more than one issue, follow the steps separately and completely for one issue before proceeding to identify the next issue
	b.	The issue may be stated more clearly in a concurring opinion
	c.	The issue may be stated more clearly in a dissenting opinion
	d.	Look to the holding
	e.	All of the above
	f.	Answers a, b, and d above

10.Which of the following are broad statements of the issue?

	a.	"The issue in this case is whether the defendant breached the contract."
	b.	"The issue in this case is whether the trial court erred when it granted the motion to suppress the evidence."
	c.	"The issue in this case is whether it is false imprisonment when law enforcement officers make an arrest."
	d.	"The issue in this case is whether an individual commits battery by being at the scene of a battery."
	e.	All of the above.

Respond to these questions:

1. How do you test to determine if your statement of the issue is complete?

2. Why do we want a comprehensive/narrow statement of the issue?

3. Why must the issue be stated objectively?

4. When drafting with multiple issues, why should they be separated?

5. Go tothis site https://www.alu.edu/alublog/master-legal-writing-with-the-irac-method/

to see our blog about IRAC. What advice to they give about the "I" in IRAC?