When the defense moved for a summary judgment in the Akstein case, what were the two general, primary assertions it was making? $($See endnote i$,$ which appears at the end of the case and is highlighted in yellow.$)$

It asserted there were no factual disputes in the matter$--$that is there was no dispute about what happened. Dr$.$ Akstein didn't deny that Ms$.$ Smith was telling the truth about what she said he did.

It asserted that Dr$.$ Akstein was entitled to judgment in his favor as far as the legal issues that were raised. In other words, Dr$.$ Akstein was saying among other things for example, that even if one believed everything Ms$.$ Smith alleged, the Eye Center was still entitled to win the case because Aksteins's conduct didn't constitute sexual harassment and that Dr$.$ Akstein could not be held personally liable under Title VII.

Both a and $b.$