Which case best describes: V had continued obstructing a supply road to S's shops and S suffered damage because he could not let his shops. The court held that the cause of action in regard to S's action for damages had continued to arise for so long as V's conduct had caused damage.

1. Oslo Land Co v Union Government 1938 AD 584
2. John Newmark and Co (Pty) Ltd v Durban City Council 1959 (1) SA 169 (D)
3. Symmonds v Rhodesia Railways 1917 AD 582.
4. Slomowitz v Vereeniging Town Council 1966 (3) SA 317 (A)