Question: Which element is not required in proving negligence per se ? A . The defendant intended the harm suffered by the plaintiff. B . The
Which element is not required in proving negligence per se
A The defendant intended the harm suffered by the plaintiff.
B The existence of a statute establishing a duty owed by one person to another.
C The statute was enacted to prevent the type of injury suffered by the plaintiff.
D The plaintiff was within a class of persons meant to be protected by the statute.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
