Question: Which element is not required in proving negligence per se ? A . The defendant intended the harm suffered by the plaintiff. B . The

Which element is not required in proving negligence per se?
A. The defendant intended the harm suffered by the plaintiff.
B. The existence of a statute establishing a duty owed by one person to another.
C. The statute was enacted to prevent the type of injury suffered by the plaintiff.
D. The plaintiff was within a class of persons meant to be protected by the statute.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related General Management Questions!