Which type of argument error does the following commit: Conclusion: College athletes should be allowed to be paid in exchange for the use of their name and likeness (by signing endorsement deals, for instance).

Argument: If another company can profit substantially from the popularity of the entertainment / service it's providing to its consumer through its employees, then that company should be paying the employees providing that service. College athletes are spending at least 40 hours per week dedicated to their sport, including games and training sessions. So, college athletes should be allowed to be paid in exchange for the use of their name and likeness.

Explanation: This argument is valid because if both of the premises were true, then the conclusion would definitely be true. If it were true that a company should pay employees substantially profiting from their services and if it were true that college athletes have done so, then it would be true that college athletes should be allowed to be paid in exchange for the use of their name and likeness. The argument is sound because both premises are true.

Please provide explanation