While the suspect gave consent to the two detectives to search, in order to have any evidence found to be wrongfully obtained. I believe that we need to establish a failure in the two detectives establishing probable cause prior to the search. According to (Florida V. Royer, 1983), Evidence obtained during the consent search of an individual when detention without probable cause is a violation of the individual's Fourth Amendment rights. While the individual may have been carrying a backpack around the town, and a series of assaults have taken place, this doesn't establish enough cause for law enforcement to stop the suspect and instigate a search. We don't have any more information on why the two detectives would believe that the individual would be a suspect of the crimes. There is no information on whether the suspect was behaving inappropriately or in an area where he should not be, which led to the detectives having probable cause. According to (Castellon, 2020, Pg 154), the number of officers and their behavior can also determine if the stop was a consensual encounter or a field interview. While law enforcement is not required to read you your Miranda warning during a field interview, the presence of officers can create an intimidating environment that we can say was used involuntarily to press the individual into a consensual search. write a response aggreing to this