Question: Why is systematic error in a data set often more damaging than random error? Systematic errors average to zero, so adding more observations minimizes their

Why is systematic error in a data set often more damaging than random error? Systematic errors average to zero, so adding more observations minimizes their impact. Random errors can easily be predicted. Random errors average to zero, so adding more observations minimizes their impact. Systematic errors average to zero, which makes your data set disappear if enough are present

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock blur-text-image
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!

Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts

Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock

Students Have Also Explored These Related Mathematics Questions!