Why is the distinction between "internal" and "combined" capabilities important to Nussbaum's argument?

Group of answer choices

It's useful in diagnosing the shortcomings of a society because internal capabilities without the social, political, or economic conditions in which the capability can be chosen is the central failing of unjust societies.

It's useful in diagnosing the achievements of a society because having people with internal capabilities is the hallmark of a just society.

It's useful in diagnosing a person's shortcomings because having the social, political, or economic conditions in which the capability can be chosen without the internal capacity for choosing and enacting them means that the individual person is at fault, not their circumstances or society.

It's useful in diagnosing both the achievements and shortcomings of a society because internal capabilities without the social, political, or economic conditions in which the capability can be chosen is a failing, as is having the conditions without people with the internalized capabilities to enact them.