Why is the human tendency to satisfice over the long run of a negotiation relationship detrimental? Group of answer choices Satisficing creates a competitive negotiation which affects the potential for pie-expansion. The satisficing party settles for a mediocre option, or something less than they could otherwise have. The satisficing party's aspirations are too high and therefore they push too aggressively during negotiation, creating a feeling of enmity with the other's party. The tendency of a person to see what they want when appraising their performance leads people to selectively seek information that confirms what they believe is true