why is the post below so important? provide feedback that adds value to it

Bayesian method, Delphi model, Bottom-up, Top-down, correlation-based, statistical models, time-series model, and the basic forecasting model by Wallace Davidson III in Financial Forecasting and Decision Making (O'Reilly playlist)

Bayesian method

The Bayesian method starts with an initial belief, called a prior, and then updates that belief when new data becomes available. The result is a posterior forecast that reflects both the old belief and the new information. This method gives forecasts in terms of probabilities, which makes it easier to see uncertainty. The challenge is that results depend on how good the prior is, and the calculations can be very demanding, especially in finance, where models often need complex tools like MCMC or structural time-series analysis.(West, 1996)

Delphi Model

The Delphi method uses expert opinion gathered anonymously over several rounds. Each round gives feedback from the group and lets participants revise their predictions. The method works well when hard data is limited and expert judgment matters. The technique helps reduce groupthink by keeping inputs anonymous but can still converge too quickly toward consensus or suppress dissenting ideas.(Jae K. Shim, 2008)

Bottom-Up vs. Top-Down

Forecasting can start from granular details or big-picture variables. The bottom-up approach builds forecasts from units like regions or products and then aggregates them upward. The top-down approach starts with market-level figures and allocates them down to units. The bottom-up method offers precision but demands substantial coordination. The top-down method operates quickly but may miss important localized trends.(Chad W. Autry, 2013)

Statistical models, time-series model

Forecasting models often rely on historical patternsusing methods like moving averages, trend analysis, regression, or ARIMA. These techniques work well when historical behavior repeats. They also help capture seasonality and trend components. Their limitations surface when data patterns shift abruptly or when markets face shocks, structural breaks, or unprecedented events.(III, 2018)

Traditional forecasting models share several weaknesses that limit their reliability. Most of these models assume that the future will mirror the past. This assumption works in stable environments but breaks down when unexpected events or structural shifts occur. Many of these models also struggle with uncertainty. For example, they may give a single-point prediction without showing the confidence level or range of possible outcomes.

Some methods depend too heavily on human judgment. The Delphi model, while valuable, can embed biases if the expert panel lacks diversity or if consensus overshadows minority opinions. Structural approaches like bottom-up and top-down have their own challenges. Bottom-up forecasting can be slow and complicated because it requires detailed inputs from many sources, while top-down forecasting risks oversimplification by ignoring local variation. Advanced models such as Bayesian and time-series techniques provide sophistication but demand statistical expertise and high computing power. These requirements make them less accessible for organizations with limited resources.

Machine learning has gained momentum because it directly addresses many of these constraints. Unlike traditional models, ML can recognize complex, non-linear patterns that humans and basic statistics might miss. ML also works well with large and messy datasets, which are common in modern finance. Another advantage is adaptability. ML models can update quickly as new data arrives, which makes them useful in fast-changing markets. They also automate tasks like feature selection, which reduces the amount of manual modeling effort.

ML methods can provide richer measures of uncertainty by generating probability distributions rather than single numbers. This capability improves decision-making because managers can weigh risks more explicitly. Still, machine learning is not flawless. It introduces new challenges such as overfitting, black-box complexity, and the need for strong validation practices. The best results come when ML is used thoughtfully, supported by financial expertise, and checked against practical realities.