Question: Why is time - sharing less efficient than a multiprogammed batch? More interrupts are required by time - sharing. There is overhead associated with switching
Why is timesharing less efficient than a multiprogammed batch?
More interrupts are required by timesharing.
There is overhead associated with switching processes.
Timesharing still holds the CPU when performing IO
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
1 Expert Approved Answer
Step: 1 Unlock
Question Has Been Solved by an Expert!
Get step-by-step solutions from verified subject matter experts
Step: 2 Unlock
Step: 3 Unlock
