With valid citations and reference list in APA format, substantively respond to the post below: "Mental health professionals' testimony should not be admissible in legal proceedings due to its inherent limitations and variability in clinical judgment, which can be influenced by bias, theoretical orientation, and contextual factors. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals established the Daubert standard for expert testimony, but clinical judgments often lack standardization and validation, and overconfidence in intuitive assessments undermines objectivity. Mental health experts' testimony should be scrutinized and excluded if it doesn't meet scientific standards, as overreliance could introduce unreliable or prejudicial evidence into legal decisions